Highline Capital Corp. v. Scharms Ventures, LLC et al
| Highline Capital Corp. |
| Scharms Ventures, LLC, Edward Schall, Betty Schall, Danny Schall and Sheri Schall |
| 1:2008cv02315 |
| October 24, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Boulder |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Richard P. Matsch |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER for Entry of Final Judgment. ORDERED that judgment shall enter for the plaintiff Highline Capital Corp. to recover from the defendants, Scharms Ventures, LLC, d/b/a FIGAROS PIZZA, a dissolved North Dakota limited liability company, Edward Schall, Betty Schall, Danny Schall, and Sheri Schall, jointly and severally, the amount of $238,310.55 with costs to be taxed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 03/23/09.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
32
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. It is Recommended that 18 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Betty Schall be Granted. 19 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Edward Schall be Granted. 20 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Scharms Ventures, LLC, d/b/a Figaro's Pizza be Granted. 26 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Danny Schall be Granted. 27 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Sheri Schall be Granted by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 02/26/09. (jjh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
