Luchaco v. Colorado State Patrol
Plaintiff: Rachel Luchaco
Defendant: Colorado State Patrol
Case Number: 1:2008cv02348
Filed: October 30, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Rio Blanco
Presiding Judge: Walker D. Miller
Presiding Judge: Kathleen M. Tafoya
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 129 ORDER. A Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Case was filed on 11/05/2010. This matter shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to pay their own fees and costs. Plaintiff's Motion for Additional Trial Time 96 and Motion for Contempt 124 are DENIED AS MOOT. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 11/08/2010. (sah, )
August 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER. CSPs Motion for Summary Judgment 81 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 08/30/2010.(sah, )
April 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 71 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya: Motion Hearing held on 4/19/2010. Granting 58 (SEALED) MOTION to Compel Discovery Responses. (FTR - Debra Brown) (kmtcd, )
March 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 61 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya: Defendants 49 MOTION to Amend Scheduling Order to Take Plaintiff's Deposition is GRANTED. Defendant is allowed to take a continued deposition of Plaintiff, Rachel L uchaco, for up to a maximum of an additional four (4) hours. The continued deposition shall be completed by April 09, 2010. Discovery is extended to April 30, 2010 for the sole purpose of allowing defendant to take the depositions of plaintiffs pare nts, plaintiffs in-laws and the plaintiffs expert as noted herein. The dispositive motion deadline remains set for April 23, 2010. Counsel for Plaintiff will personally assure that dates, times and locations for defendant to depose plaintiffs two par ents and plaintiffs mother-in-law and plaintiffs father-in-law are communicated to the deponents. The defendant is responsible for issuing appropriate subpoenas once the dates are agreed upon through plaintiffs counsel. Plaintiffs counsel will assure the attendance of the four deponents as arranged. Plaintiffs Gender Discrimination Experts report shall be filed and the expert deposed no later than April 30, 2010.(FTR - Debra Brown) (kmtcd, )
December 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 45 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya: Motion Hearing held on 12/28/2009. Granting 42 Motion for Protective Order. The deposition of the Plaintiff will be taken in Grand Junction, Colorado at the specified date and time. The Motion for protective order is limited to the facts of Plaintiffs deposition only. No costs will be awarded either party. (FTR - Debra Brown) (kmtcd, )
October 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 41 Minute ORDER granting 37 Unopposed MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify 23 Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Rachel Luchaco. Discovery due by 1/27/2010. Dispositive Motions due by 2/26/2010. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 4/22/2010. Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/27/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 10/28/09.(kmtcd)
October 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 39 Stipulated PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 10/22/09. (kmtcd)
June 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MINUTE ORDER granting 32 The Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. The Expert Witness Disclosure Deadline is extended to 08/17/2009; the Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosure Deadline is extended to 09/17/2009; the Discovery Cut-off is extended to 10/26/2009; and the Dispositive Motion Deadline is extended to 11/30/2009 by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 06/16/2009.(sah, )
March 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER. The settlement conference in this matter is hereby re-scheduled for 04/14/2009 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom C-201 by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 03/12/2009. (sah, )
February 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER denying without prejudice 15 Plaintiffs Motion to Change Venue by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 02/17/2009.(sah, )
February 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER. A Settlement Conference is set for 4/14/2009 10:30 AM in Courtroom C201 by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 02/12/2009. (sah, )
January 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER, A Scheduling and Planning Conference is set for 2/12/2009 09:45 AM in Courtroom C205, Second Floor, of the Byron Rogers U.S. Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 01/09/2009. (sah, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Luchaco v. Colorado State Patrol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rachel Luchaco
Represented By: John Keith Killian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Colorado State Patrol
Represented By: Christine K. Wilkinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?