Stone v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
| Christopher E. Stone |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation, Robert (I) J. Stevens, Robert J. Steven, Brent (I) Thoden, Brent Thoden, J. (I) Michael Conley, J. Michael Conley, Michael (I) Keyack, Michael Keyack, Alice (I) Eldridge, Alice Eldridge, Terry (I) Jefferson, Terry Jefferson, Francine (I) Lessard, Francine Lessard, Grant (I) Castleberry, Grant Castleberry, Wanda (I) Hunter, Wanda Hunter, Max (I) Beal and Max Beal |
| 1:2008cv02522 |
| November 19, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| El Paso |
| Walker D. Miller |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 38:4301 Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
ORDER denying 87 Plaintiffs Motion To Amend Judgment. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 03/10/2010.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT: Judgment shall enter against the plaintiff, Christopher E. Stone, and in favor of the defendants, Lockheed Martin Corporation, a Maryland Corporation, Robert J. Stevens (also named as Robert J. Steven), Brent Thoden, J. M ichael Conley, Michael Keyack, Alice Eldridge, Terry Jefferson, Francine Lessard, Grant Castleberry, Wanda Hunter, and Max Beal. Defendants are awarded their costs to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. This case is dismissed, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/4/10. (ebs, )
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 76 filed 04/16/2009, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Under FED. R. CIV. P. 4(m), the plaintiffs claims against defendants, Robert J. Stevens, Brent Thoden, J. Michael Conley, Michael Keyack, Ali ce Eldridge, Terry Jefferson, Francine Lessard, Grant Castleberry, Wanda Hunter, and Max Beal, are DISMISSED without prejudice. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 77 filed 06/25/2009 is REJECTED and the Plaintiffs FRCP 72 Objecti on To Recommendation for Dismissal 80 , is SUSTAINED. Under FED. R. CIV. P. 8, Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporations Motion To Dismiss 31 filed 01/21/2009 is GRANTED. Under FED. R. CIV. P. 8, the plaintiffs Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial [ 1], filed 11/18/2008, is DISMISSED without prejudice. The plaintiff SHALL HAVE until 10/26/2009, to file an amended complaint, which complies with the requirements of FED. R. CIV. P. 8. Absent the filing of an amended complaint by the plaintiff on or before 10/26/2009, the court SHALL DISMISS this case and enter judgment based on the dismissal of the plaintiffs complaint under FED. R. CIV. P. 8.. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 09/24/2009.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
77
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporations Motion to Dismiss 31 be GRANTED as follows: Plaintiffs claims asserted under Title VII, the ADA, the ADEA, and the Rehabilitation Act (Counts 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 1 2, 13, 15, 16, and 18) be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; 2. Plaintiffs claims asserted under USERRA be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; 3. Plaintiffs claims asserted under the FMLA be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; 4. Plaintiffs remaining claims asserted under Colorado law be dismissed without prejudice. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 06/25/2009. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
76
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: that the 1 the claims against Defendants Robert J. Stevens; Brent Thoden; J. Michael Conley; Michael Keyack; Alice Eldridge; Terry Jefferson; Francine Lessard; Grant Cassleberry; Wanda Hunter; and Max Beal be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R.Civ. P. 4(m) for lack of service by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 04/16/2009. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER. Plaintiff's 61 Motion to Strike Defendant's 'Reply In Support of Motion to Dismiss', Or In The Alternative, for leave to File Surreply", and "Motion to Apply USETTA Vindication" is DENIED. Plaintiffs 63 Motion to Reconsider Recusal of Judge Blackburn and Magistrate Judge Tafoya Under 28 USC 455, Second Judicial Notice and Motion to Enforce USERRA Vindication, and Motion for Judge Blackburn and Magistrate Judge Tafoya to Disclose Information Related to Recusal" is DENIED by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 03/12/2009.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER denying 63 Plaintiffs Motion To Reconsider Recusal of Judge Blackburn and Magistrate Judge Tafoya Under 28 USC 455 by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 03/02/2009.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER denying 22 plaintiffs Notice & Motion for Recusal of Judge Blackburn and Magistrate Judge Tafoya, to the extent the plaintiff seeks the recusal of Judge Blackburn and denying 50 plaintiffs Renewed Notice & Motion for Recusal of Judge Blackburn by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 02/13/2008.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER. The Emergency Motion to Preserve Evidence 33 is Denied without prejudice. Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporations' Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Ruling on Motion to Dismiss 36 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Protec t Plaintiff from Defendants' Process and Discovery Abuse 41 is DENIED without prejudice by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 02/02/2009.(sah, ) Modified on 2/3/2009 to include rulings on two motions that were overlooked when the order was intially docketed (sah, ).
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER denying 22 Plaintiffs Notice & Motion for Recusal of Judge Blackburn and Magistrate Judge Tafoya", as it relates to the recusal of Magistrate Judge Tafoya. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 01/09/2009.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER denying 19 Plaintiffs First Amended Motion to Set Aside Order for Extension of Time; First Amended Response in Opposition to Motion for Extension of Time; Motion to Expedite & Set Hearing; Motion to Prevent Prejudice & Exclude Answer to Complaint; Motion for Clarification; Motion for Relief from Order; Motion to Stay Answer to Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 01/08/2009.(sah, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
