Sprehe v. United States Postal Service et al
| David K. Sprehe |
| United States Postal Service and John E. Potter |
| 1:2008cv02595 |
| November 28, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment Office |
| Douglas |
| Walker D. Miller |
| Craig B Shaffer |
| Plaintiff |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 29:791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 30 DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. The 30 Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Summary judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Mr. Sprehe on all claims. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 05/04/2010.(wjc, )
|
|
Filing
47
Minute Entry for Final Pretrial Conference held before Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 4/27/2010. Partial Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Information regarding any additional deadline(s) are set forth in the Minutes. (Court Reporter Paul Zuckerman) (mskcd)
|
|
Filing
15
TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER-CIVIL: Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/27/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 901 before Judge Marcia S. Krieger. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 4/29/09. (msksec, )
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER Resetting Scheduling Conference for 4/28/2009 at 10:45 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer, by Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer on 03/06/09. (wjc, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
