Darris v. Denver, City and County of et al
| Stephan Darris |
| Denver, City and County of, Denver Sheriff Department, Denver Medical Health, Pugliese, Shaffer, St. Germain and Roy |
| 1:2008cv02624 |
| December 3, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Prison Condition Office |
| Denver |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
ORDER: Plaintiff's request in his letter 108 that Magistrate Judge Tafoya be recused or, in the alternative, that this action be dismissed without prejudice is denied. Accepting 107 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Grantin g 101 Defendants Pugliese, Shaffer, St. Germain, and Daugherty's Motion for Summary Judgment, and the claims against them are dismissed without prejudice. Granting 99 Defendant Robinson's Motion for Summary Judgment, and the claims against him are dismissed with prejudice. All other pending motions are denied as moot, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/27/10.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
105
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya: Motion Hearing held on 1/13/2010. Denying 91 MOTION for an Order Compelling Discovery, by Plaintiff. Plaintiffs oral Motion to Dismiss, without prejudice, is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiffs oral Motion for a hearing before District Judge Brimmer is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff is advised by the Court to file an appropriate written Motion to Dismiss with the Court. (FTR - Debra Brown.) (kmtcd, )
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER accepting 76 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Denying 56 Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider Denied Motion to Amend Prisoner Complaint, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/30/09.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
79
Minute ORDER denying as premature 77 MOTION (for Order) to Subpeona Witnesses, by Plaintiff Stephan Darris by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/11/09.(kmtcd)
|
|
Filing
76
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 56 Plaintiff's MOTION to Reconsider Denied Motion to Amend Prisoner Complaint be denied, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/8/09. (ebs, )
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER denying 51 Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider Request for Volanter Councel [sic], by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 6/26/09.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER denying 48 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Prisoner Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 6/10/09.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
32
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya: Motion Hearing held on 3/26/2009. Granting 25 Defendant's Motion to Quash Service of Process Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(5). Ms. Haas hereby accepts service on behalf of the Defendant, Roy, LPN, as of today's date. Clerk shall correct the name of the Defendant Roy, LPN, to LPN Roy Robinson. Defendant's Answer to the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 5) is due as provided in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Court Reporter FTR- Debra Brown.) (ebs, )
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER Preliminary Scheduling Conference set for 5/19/2009 09:30 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/2/09. (gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER denying 7 Plaintiff Stephan Darris' Motion for TRO. Signed by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 1/12/09.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER Drawing Case. Ordered that this case be assigned to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 01/09/2009. (sah, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
