Fowler v. Garrick
Plaintiff: Jason Fowler
Defendant: USA and Sean Garrick
Case Number: 1:2008cv02650
Filed: December 5, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Mesa
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Presiding Judge: Philip A. Brimmer
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. All claims by and between plaintiff and defendant are dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. This case shall be closed in its entirety. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 11/8/11. (mnfsl, )
October 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 74 AMENDED ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES re: 72 Order. Discovery due by 2/23/2012. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/26/11. (mnfsl, )
February 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER granting 51 Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Defendant Garrick. Plaintiff's claims against Mr. Garrick in this action are dismissed with prejudice, with each side paying their own costs and attorney fees. Final judgment shall enter against plaintiff and in favor of the defendants. Discharging as moot 46 Order to Show Cause, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 2/9/10.(ebs, )
December 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER granting 32 Defendant United States' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. The United States is dismissed as a defendant. Denying 30 Defendant Sean Garrick's Motion to Certify Scope of Employment and to Dismiss Him from this Action as a Defendant. Sean Garrick is now the only defendant remaining in this action, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/28/09.(ebs, )
May 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER granting 26 Joint Motion to Stay Discovery. Discovery and all related pretrial deadlines are stayed pending a determination of the issue of sovereign immunity. The United States shall file a status report immediately upon any decision not t o file a motion to dismiss based on sovereign immunity or a decision to abandon that defense. The parties shall file a status report within 10 days of any ruling by the district judge determining the issue of sovereign immunity, discussing the additional pretrial matters, if any, that should be scheduled, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/4/09.(ebs, )
April 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER denying 22 Unopposed Motion to Vacate Expert Disclosure Deadlines, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/27/09.(ebs, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fowler v. Garrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Fowler
Represented By: Bruce Jeffrey Kaye
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sean Garrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?