Kopec v. Suthers
| Michael Gerard Kopec |
| John Suthers and Ron Leyba |
| 1:2008cv02655 |
| December 8, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Fremont |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER RETURNING 29 State Court Records to Jefferson County District Court by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 5/7/2010. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
33
AMENDED ORDER Adopting and Affirming October 30, 2009 30 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING 10 Second Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Michael Gerard Kopec, and this civil action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is FU RTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability should not issue because Applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. A certificate of appealability may issue only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). Applicant is not entitled to a certificate of appealability. by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 12/10/09. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER ACCEPTED 30 Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge, and, for the reasons cited therein, Applicants Second Amended Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, filed January 9, 2009 10 , is DENIED and this civil action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 12/9/09.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
30
RECOMMENDATION of United States Magistrate Judge. It is RECOMMENDED that the 10 Second Amended Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be DENIED and that this case be dismissed with prejudice. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/30/2009. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER to Dismiss in Part and Draw Case to A District Judge and to a Magistrate Judge. Ordered that the second amended habeas corpus application is denied in part. Claim two is dismissed for failure to exhaust and for failure to assert a cognizable habeas corpus claim. Claim one and the case are drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 04/16/2009. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 20 days Respondents shall file a Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 20 days of the filing of the Pre-Answer Response Applicant may file a Reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 01/12/09. (jjh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
