Medicine Blanket v. Brill et al
Petitioner: Charles G. Medicine Blanket
Respondent: Hoyte Brill and Colorado Attorney General
Case Number: 1:2008cv02735
Filed: December 16, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Kit Carson
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 70 USCA ORDER DENYING 67 PETITION (Motion) for Authroization to File a Second or Succvessive Habeas Corpus Petition. This denial of authorization shall not be appealable and shall not be the subject of a petition for rehearing or for a writ of certiorari on 1/16/14. (dbrow, )
August 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER Granting Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis on Appeal after Review re 49 Notice of Appeal by Charles Medicine Blanket, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 08/23/10. (bjrsl, )
April 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 36 Applicants Motion to Compel by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/6/2010.(klmcd)
October 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER that on or before 12/01/2009 the Clerk of the Arapahoe County District Court shall provide to this Court the original written record of criminal case no. 97CR4188, People v. Charles G. Medicine Blanket. The record shall be mailed to the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order on the Clerk of the Arapahoe County District Court by facsimile and by regular mail, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/20/2009. (wjc, )
July 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER denying 20 Motion to Compel Petitioners [sic] Writ Ad Testificandum; denying 21 Motion to Appoint Indigent Counsel. ORDERED that the Clerk shall send a copy of this Order and Applicants Motion No. 21 to Attorney Alison Ruttenburg, P.O. Box 19857, Boulder, CO 80308 by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 7/21/2009.(klmcd)
April 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER to Dismiss in Part and to Assign Case. Claims One through Four shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge for further review of the merits. claims Five is denied as procedurally barred. Mr. Medicine Blanket's Motion for Leave to Supplement 13 , filed on 03/18/2009, is DENIED as moot by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 04/23/2009.(sah, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Medicine Blanket v. Brill et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles G. Medicine Blanket
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Hoyte Brill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Colorado Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?