Center for Native Ecosystems et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
| Center for Native Ecosystems, Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, Utah Native Plant Society and Colorado Native Plant Society |
| U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Dirk Kempthorne |
| 1:2008cv02744 |
| December 16, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Environmental Matters Office |
| Denver |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Walker D. Miller |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 16:1538 Endangered Species Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER Approving 75 Joint Stipulation to Settle Plaintiff's Claims for Attorneys' Fees and Costs filed by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Dirk Kempthorne. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 3/15/2012. (jjpsl, )
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER. FWS violated the ESA in withdrawing the proposed rule to list Graham's penstemon by failing to consider the threats in combination, ignoring or disregarding the best available scientific and commercial information, and relying on undeter mined or unspecified conservation measures which were not implemented or established to be effective. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' petition is granted to the following extent. Pursuant to the APA, 5 U.S.C. § 706, the 12/19/2006 Final Rule is va cated and the proposed rule is reinstated. The matter is remanded to the FWS for further consideration, with all deliberate speed, of a new Final Rule with respect to whether Graham's penstemon should be listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. By Judge Walker D. Miller on 6/9/11. (mnf, )
|
|
Filing
48
MINUTE ORDER granting 47 Defendants' Motion to Correct Minute Order. The correct deadline is July 5, 2010, by Judge Walker D. Miller on 5/21/10.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 Defendants' MOTION to Strike Extra-Record Declarations and Documents, by Judge Walker D. Miller on 5/20/10. (ebs, )
|
|
Filing
44
Minute Entry for Motion Hearing proceedings held before Judge Walker D. Miller on 5/19/2010. GRANTING in PART and DENYING in PART, without prejudice 33 Motion to Strike; Counsel shall submit proposed orders on or before July 5, 2010. (Court Reporter Kara Spitler)(babia)
|
|
Filing
41
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Walker D. Miller: Oral Argument Hearing held on 3/23/2010. Taking under advisement 33 Motion to Strike and the Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief 1 is taken under advisement. (Court Reporter Kara Spitler) (gkram ) Modified on 3/24/2010 to create linkage to document number 1 (ebs, ).
|
|
Filing
23
MINUTE ORDER: granting 21 Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Defendants shall supplement the administrative record no later than August 21, 2009.If necessary, any motions concerning the contents of the administrative record shall be due no lat er than September 4, 2009. The parties agree to meet and confer prior to filing any such motions. Adm Plaintiffs Brief due by 9/4/2009. Adm Defendants Brief due by 10/9/09, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/4/09.(bnbcd, ) Modified on 8/5/2009 to correct deadlines to accurately reflect the minute order (gms, )
|
|
Filing
14
Minute ORDER granting 12 Unopposed Motion for Leave to Appear by Telephone at scheduling conference on 3/6/09, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/19/09.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 3/6/2009 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. Signed by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/8/09. (gms, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
