Leonard H. Chanda & Associates, L.P. v. Meridian Metropolitan District et al
Leonard H. Chanda & Associates, L.P. |
Design Control Committee of Meridian International Business Center, Raymond A. Bullock, Michael A. Barber, John Kilrow, Phil McCurdy, Rick Poppe, John M. Prosser, Laurel S. Raines, Jerome M. Seracuse, Douglas C. Scott, Peter Italiano, Brent Miller, George Weaver and Meridian Metropolitan District |
1:2009cv00014 |
January 5, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
Douglas |
Wiley Y. Daniel |
Michael E. Hegarty |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 103 ORDER of Dismissal With Prejudice. Each party to bear its own attorney fees and costs by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 08/07/12. (jjhsl, ) |
Filing 97 MINUTE ORDER granting 96 Motion to Amend Proposed Findings of Fact. Plaintiff's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law [ECF No. 89] is amended on page 12 as described in the motion by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 06/19/12.(jjhsl, ) |
Filing 95 MINUTE ENTRY for Trial Preparation Conference proceedings held on 6/12/2012 before Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel. Denying without prejudice 83 Motion in Limine; Trial Preparation Conference held on 6/12/2012. (Court Reporter: Therese Lindblom) (wydcd, rrk) |
Filing 74 ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 52 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. The motion is GRANTED and judgment is entered in favor of all Defendants on Plaintiffs Sixth, Seventh and Ninth Claims for Relief. The motions is also GRANT ED as to all claims against Defendants Raymond A. Bullock and Douglas C. Scott. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiffs Eighth Claim for Relief against Defendant DCC. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer and contact chambers to schedule a trial to the Court on Plaintiffs Eighth Claim for Relief and a final trial preparation conference. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 9/30/2010.(erv, ) |
Filing 51 ORDER granting 50 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Dismiss. Defendants Michael R. Barber, Phil McCurdy, Rick Poppe, John M. Prosser, Laurel S. Raines, Jerome M. Seracuse, and Brent Miller are dismissed without prejudice as parties to this case, by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 10/20/09.(gmssl, ) |
Filing 49 ORDER re: 48 Stipulation of Dismissal of Party. Plaintiff's Third Claim for Relief against Meridian Metropolitan District is dismissed without prejudice and Defendant Meridian Metropolitan District is dismissed as a party to this case, by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 10/14/09. (gmssl, ) |
Filing 42 ORDER granting 11 Defendant Meridian Metropolitan District's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's 4th claim for relief is dismissed without prejudice. Denying 16 DCC Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 9/28/09.(gms, ) |
Filing 34 ORDER granting 32 Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First and Second Claims for Relief. Plaintiffs First and Second Claims for Relief are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear his or its own costs and attorneys fees. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 5/19/09.(erv, ) |
Filing 18 ORDER granting 17 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Fifth Claim for Relief, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and Defendants John Kilrow, Peter Italiano, and George Weaver are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, each party to bear their own attorneys fees and costs. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 2/13/09.(erv, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.