Lopez Portillo v. USA et al
| Amelida Lopez Portillo |
| USA, Michael Mukasey and Michael Chertoff |
| 1:2009cv00070 |
| January 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Other Immigration Actions Office |
| Denver |
| Christine M. Arguello |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 05:0701 Administrative Procedure Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER granting 14 the parties Stipulated Motion to Dismiss WITH PREJUDICE, each party to pay his, her or its own costs and attorneys fees. by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 3/17/2010.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER OF ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSURE. The Clerk of the Court shall administratively close this action pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2. The parties shall have ten days from the date of the Executive Office of Immigration Reviews ruling within which to submit the appropriate paperwork to either reopen or dismiss this action. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 10/22/2009. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER denying 2 Motion for TRO Without Prejudice and Setting Emergency Telephonic Conference Regarding Plaintiff's Deportation Status 1/22/09 at 1:30 p.m. The Court has set aside approximately one hour for this conference. Lead counsel for both parties are DIRECTED to call Chambers (303-335-2174) via conference call on one line at the appropriate time to participate in this telephonoc conference. Signed by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 1/21/09.(erv, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
