Big O Tires, LLC v. Gaskin Enterprises, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: |
Big O Tires, LLC |
Defendant: |
Gaskin Enterprises, Inc. and David R. Gaskin |
Case Number: |
1:2009cv00099 |
Filed: |
January 20, 2009 |
Court: |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Office: |
Trademark Office |
County: |
Arapahoe |
Presiding Judge: |
Walker D. Miller |
Presiding Judge: |
Kristen L. Mix |
Nature of Suit: |
None |
Cause of Action: |
Federal Question |
Jury Demanded By: |
15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
January 21, 2010 |
Filing
92
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Granting 91 Stipulation and Joint Motion for Approval of Stipulation Resolving Case. The Permanent Injunction entered May 28, 2009 67 shall remain in place. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), all remaining claims asserted in this matter are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 1/21/10.(ebs, )
|
October 6, 2009 |
Filing
85
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 83 Plaintiff's Unopposed Amended Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 12/17/2009. Dispositive Motions due by 1/19/2010. Final Pretrial Conference reset for 3/29/2010 10:30 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 3/22/2010, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/6/09.(ebs, )
|
October 5, 2009 |
Filing
82
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 80 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Scheduling Order, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/5/09.(ebs, )
|
July 1, 2009 |
Filing
69
AMENDED ORDER OF REFERENCE TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Kristen L. Mix, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 7/1/09. (ebs, )
|
May 28, 2009 |
Filing
67
ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT INJUNCTION pursuant to the 65 Stipulation and Joint Motion for Approval of Stipulation Resolving Equitable Issues in Case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65. Defendants and their officers, agents, etc. are permanently enj oined from engaging in such acts in Oregon and the United States or in foreign commerce as set forth in this Order. Defendants are ordered to deliver to Big O all signs, advertising materials, etc. in possession of or under the control of Defendants that use the Marks or Trade Dress. Defendants and their officers, agents, etc. are enjoined for two years beginning 7/31/09 from directly or indirectly engaging in any business which offers or sells tires, etc. as set forth in this Order. Defendan ts shall return to Big O all manuals and proprietary materials of Big O and provide Big O with GEI's customer list. Defendants shall comply with this Order by 7/31/09. By 7/31/09, Defendants shall file with the Court and serve on Big O a report, setting forth the manner and form in which they have complied with this order, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/28/09. (ebs, )
|
May 6, 2009 |
Filing
47
AMENDED ORDER OF REFERENCE TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Kristen L. Mix, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/6/09. (ebs, )
|
May 4, 2009 |
Filing
45
ORDER granting 38 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Verified Complaint and Demand for Injunctive Relief. The Court accepts Plaintiff's Amended Verified Complaint and Demand for Injunctive Relief (Docket No. 38-2) for filing as of the date of this Order. Plaintiff shall serve the Amended Complaint on Defendants on or before 5/22/09. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint within 10 days of service pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3), by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 5/4/09.(ebs, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?