Jiron v. Sloan et al
| Lawrence M. Jiron |
| Brighman Sloan, Bill Ritter and John W. Suthers |
| 1:2009cv00102 |
| January 21, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Bent |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
Minute ORDER denying 31 "Motion of Review of Documents" filed on 2/16/11. Applicant may obtain copies of any documents filed in this action by contacting the clerk of the Court and paying any required charges, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 2/17/11.(lyg, )
|
|
Filing
28
Minute ORDER denying as Moot 27 Motion and Notice to Attorney General of Unconstitutional Statute. Applicant's case was dismissed on 06/24/09 by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 06/29/09.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER of Dismissal. Ordered that the habeas corpus application and the amended application are denied and the action is dismissed because the claims ar procedurally barred. Order denying 20 Motion for Order and denying 22 Motion for Order and denying 23 Motion for Order by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 06/23/09.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiency. Applicant has 30 days to file a certified copy of prisoner's trust fund statement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/16/2009. (llk, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
