Lambert v. Travel Centers of America
Plaintiff: Rikki Lambert
Defendant: Travel Centers of America
Case Number: 1:2009cv00120
Filed: January 22, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Arapahoe
Presiding Judge: Craig B. Shaffer
Presiding Judge: Zita L. Weinshienk
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE, each party to pay her or its own costs and attorneys fees, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 01/20/2010.(wjc, )
January 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 67 MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 62 Defendant's Motion in Limine to Limit Trial Testimony, Evidence and Argument on Plaintiff's Work History; denying as moot 63 Defendant's Motion in Limine to Limit Trial Testimony, Evidence and Argume nt on Plaintiff's Claim for Emotional Distress Damages. The Trial Preparation Conference set for 01/22/2010 at 9:30 AM and the Jury Trial commencing 02/01/2010 are hereby vacated. Dismissal Paper due by 2/1/2010, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 01/11/2010.(wjc, )
December 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 64 MINUTE ORDER granting 60 Defendants unopposed Motion to Amend the Final Pretrial Order by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/31/09.(erv, )
November 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 47 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court lacks jurisdiction to hear Plaintiffs claim for retaliation pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended; thus, the claim is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff conceded summary judgment on her claim for punitive damages under Title VII; therefore, the claim is dismissed with prejudice. The Court finds genuine issues of material fact exist with respect to whether the Plaintiff was terminated based upon her pregnancy; thus, Plaintiffs claim for pregnancy discrimination pursuant to Title VII will proceed to trial, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/16/2009.(wjc, )
August 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER granting 39 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint Out of Time. Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint by 8/7/2009. Reset Deadlines: Discovery due by 8/24/2009. Dispositive Motions due by 9/21/2009. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/3/2009. (mehcd)
June 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 34 TRIAL PROCEDURES ORDER: Trial is set for three (3) days, to a jury, beginning on 12/01/2009 at 9:00 AM. The Trial Preparation Conference is set for 11/13/2009 at 9:30 AM, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 06/29/09. (wjc, )
June 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 30 Courtroom Minutes/Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Status Conference held on 6/26/2009. Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Dispositive Motion due by 8/14/2009. Defendant's Reply due by 8/31 /2009. Set Hearings: Three-day Jury Trial set for 12/1/2009 09:00 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Trial Preparation Conference set for 11/13/2009 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegar ty. 17 Defendant's Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify is GRANTED. Defendant shall file the First Amended Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint and Jury Demand (Doc. #17-2,attachment to the above motion), without the Exhibit A cover sheet. (Court Reporter FTR - C. Coomes) (mehcd)
June 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MINUTE ORDER striking 25 Plaintiff's Motion to File Amended Complaint for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 06/22/09.(wjc, )
June 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER: The 2 Order of Reference issued by Judge Weinshienk is hereby vacated. The pending 17 Motion to Amend the 5 Answer to Include an After-Acquired Evidence Affirmative Defense is no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. Pu rsuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), United States Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer is designated to convene such settlement conferences and direct related proceedings as may facilitate resolution of this case. Status/Scheduling Conference set for 6/26/2009 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 06/15/09. (wjc, )
February 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 3/27/2009 09:15 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer, by Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer on 2/3/09. (gms, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lambert v. Travel Centers of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rikki Lambert
Represented By: Robert Mark Liechty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Travel Centers of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?