Blessing v. Option One Mortgage Corporation et al
| David D. Blessing |
| Option One Mortgage Corporation, Robert (I) E. Dubrish, Robert E. Dubrish, Stephanie (I) O'Malley, Stephanie O'Malley, Alvin (I) LaCabe and Alvin LaCabe |
| 1:2009cv00474 |
| March 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| Denver |
| Philip A. Brimmer |
| Craig B. Shaffer |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1333 Admiralty |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Granting 36 Petitioner's Verified Motion to Dismiss. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), this matter, and all claims asserted therein, is dismissed without prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/28/09.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
34
MINUTE ORDER granting 30 Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Stay Scheduling Conference, Disclosures, and Discovery Deadlines, Pending Rulings on Motions to Dismiss. Scheduling Conference is converted to a Status Conference set for 6/9/2009 09:15 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. Parties are not required to comply with the deadlines set forth in the 4 Order, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 5/26/09.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 6/9/2009 09:15 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer, by Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer on 3/11/09. (ebs, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
