Young v. Wiley
Petitioner: David Dean Young
Respondent: Ron Wiley
Case Number: 1:2009cv00538
Filed: March 13, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Fremont
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Watanabe
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER. The Recommendation on Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 2241 (Docket No. 2) 34 filed 7/8/2012, is APPROVED and ADOPTED. The Recommendation on Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U .S.C § 2241 (Docket No. 2) 32 filed 7/8/2010, is TERMINATEDon the docket as moot. The objections stated in the plaintiffs Objects to Magistrates Report and Recommendation 33 filed 7/27/2010, are OVERRULED. The applicants Application for a Wr it of Habeas Corpus Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. § 2241 2 filed 3/13/2009, is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. JUDGMENT SHALL ENTER in favor of the respondent, Ron Wiley, Warden, and against the applicant, David Dean Young. The respondent is AWARDED his costs. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/14/2012.(sah, )
June 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MINUTE ORDER granting 28 petitioners Motion to Construe Applicants Reply as a Response to Order to Show Cause. Accordingly, 27 will be considered by the court as the petitioners response to this courts Order to Show Cause 25 , along with petitioners arguments in 28 . It is further ORDERED that the respondent shall file a reply to the arguments made by the petitioner in Docket Nos. 27 , and 28 on or before July 7, 2010. by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 6/16/2010.(erv, )
June 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MINUTE ORDER granting 15 petitioners Motion to Order Respondent to Show Cause. On or before 07/10/2009, respondent shall file a response to the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus 2 by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 06/09/2009.(sah, )
April 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER REFERRING HABEAS PETITION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 04/23/2009. (sah, )
April 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER Drawing Case. Ordered that this case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 04/15/2009. (sah, )
March 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 1 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO COMMENCE CIVIL ACTION AND DIRECTING APPLICANT TO CURE DEFICIENCY. Applicant has 30 days to cure deficiencies and submit filing fee or in forma pauperis motion, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/12/09. (jak, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Young v. Wiley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David Dean Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ron Wiley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?