Macklin v. Banner et al
Plaintiff: Bruce Macklin
Defendant: Helen D. Banner, Donald James Banner, Albert David Demicell and SOUTHERNCOLORADOLAWERS, P.C.
Case Number: 1:2009cv00609
Filed: March 19, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Richard P. Matsch
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER for Dismissal as to Remaining Defendant. Ordered that this action is dismissed without prejudice as to the remaining defendant, Albert David Demicell, a/k/a Bert Demicell, each party to bear their own respective costs and attorneys fees by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 06/28/10. (jjh, )
June 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER of Dismissal With Prejudice. Ordered that the dismissal with prejudice is approved, and the within action between the Plaintiff Bruce Macklin and Defendant Donald J. Banner, Helen D. Banner and Southern Colorado Lawyers, P.C. be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice, each party to his or her own costs by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 06/17/10. (jjh, )
April 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 48 Amended ORDER re: 47 Order, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/9/2010 (amended to correct type of trial).(rpmcd)
September 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 34 Stipulated PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 09/24/09. (jjh, )
June 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 8/24/2009 at 02:00 PM in Conference Room and proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on August 20, 2009. Signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/15/2009. (rpmcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Macklin v. Banner et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bruce Macklin
Represented By: Daniel Adam Wartell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Helen D. Banner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donald James Banner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Albert David Demicell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SOUTHERNCOLORADOLAWERS, P.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?