Haggard v. Synthes Spine
Plaintiff: Jamie Haggard
Defendant: Synthes Spine
Case Number: 1:2009cv00721
Filed: April 1, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Larimer
Presiding Judge: Christine M. Arguello
Presiding Judge: Kathleen M. Tafoya
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Stipulated Final Order by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 12/16/09. (erv, )
July 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER denying 56 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 7/30/09.(erv, )
June 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER granting 7 Defendant's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 6/12/09.(erv, )
June 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER Granting 26 Unopposed MOTION to Seal Synthes' Trade Secret Documents and to Close to the Public Portions of Court Proceedings Disclosing Those Trade Secrets filed by Synthes Spine by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 6/10/09. (erv, )
June 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER denying 42 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Permit Dr. Benz to Attend Hearing Via Telephone, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 6/8/09.(gmssl, )
June 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 7/7/2009 09:15 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 6/3/09. (erv, )
June 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 36 COURTROOM MINUTES - Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Christine M. Arguello: Status Conference held on 6/2/2009. Finding as moot 3 Motion for TRO; Finding as moot 8 Motion to Vacate; Granting 26 Motion to Seal - Counsel shall draft and submit to the Court a Proposed Order clarifying what information will and will not be sealed on or before June 8, 2009; Referred to Magistarte Judge Tafoya 10 Synthes' Motion for Expedited Discovery. Synthes Motion for Temporary Retraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction Against Jamie Haggard (7) is set for a half-day hearing on June 10, 2009, at 1:30 p.m. (Court Reporter Darlene Martinez) (cmacd)
April 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting 16 Motion for TRO only to preserve the status quo and to try to resolve this matter, thus avoiding the cost associated with proceeding with an initial hearing. ; The hearing set for April 15, 2009 at 3:00 p.m. is VACATED. At the parties request, this hearing may be rescheduled as soon as possible on or after May 6, 2009. by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 4/14/09.(erv, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haggard v. Synthes Spine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jamie Haggard
Represented By: Erik G. Fischer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Synthes Spine
Represented By: Daniel Mitchell Combs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?