Humes v. Arellano et al
| 1:2009cv00757 |
| April 3, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER RETURNING STATE COURT RECORD by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 05/21/2012. (wjcsl, )
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER Denying 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. No certificate of appealability will issue because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 11/01/2010. (wjc, )
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 6/21/2010 re: doc # 33 Letter filed by Eric Humes. Pursuant to the court's direction, a copy of doc # 32 Reply to Respondent's Answer was mailed to Mr. Humes this date. (cbscd)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER TO FORWARD ALL RECORDS AND TRANSCRIPTS. The Clerk of the Court for the Denver District Court shall forward all records and transcripts of the state court proceedings in People v. Humes, Denver District Court Case No. 2004CR000088, to the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. The Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court for the District of Colorado shall deliver a copy of this Order to the Clerk of the Court for the City and County of Denver, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 10/15/2009. (wjc, ) Modified on 10/19/2009 to correct filed date (wjc, ).
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER to Draw In Part and to Dismiss In Part. Claim Seven is dismissed for reasons stated in this Order. Claims One through Six, Eight, and Nine shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 07/31/2009. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 20 days Respondents shall file a Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 20 days of the filing of the Pre-Answer Response Applicant may file a Reply by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 05/01/09. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
1
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiency. Applicant shall have 30 days to either submit a 1915 motion or pay the filing fee, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/2/09. (jak, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Humes v. Arellano et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
