Wieberg v. Zavaras et al
Petitioner: Gregory Keith Wieberg
Respondent: Aristedes Zavaras and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Case Number: 1:2009cv00868
Filed: April 15, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Bent
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER RETURNING 27 STATE COURT RECORD. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/3/13. (Attachments: # 1 Letter) (mnfsl, )
December 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER: Applicant Gregory Keith Wieberg's Amended Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is denied. No certificate of appealability will issue because Applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. This case is dismissed with prejudice, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/29/10. (ebs, )
July 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER TO FORWARD ALL RECORDS AND TRANSCRIPTS: The Clerk for the District Court of Mesa County, Colorado shall forward the flat file and hearing transcripts for all proceedings in the trial court and in the appellate court in People v. Gregory K. Wieberg, Mesa County District Court, Case No. 05CR1851, to the Clerk for the U.S. District Court by 8/23/10. Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order on the Clerk for the Mesa County District Court, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/26/10. (ebs, )
July 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER to Dismiss in Part and Draw Case to A District Judge and to a Magistrate Judge. Claim two in the amended application filed on April 27, 2009, is dismissed as procedurally barred. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 07/15/2009. (sah, )
May 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 20 days Respondents shall file a Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 20 days of the filing of the Pre-Answer Response Applicant may file a Reply by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 05/01/09. (jjh, )
April 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiency. Applicant shall have 30 days to submit a petition on the proper court form, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/14/09. (jak, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wieberg v. Zavaras et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gregory Keith Wieberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Aristedes Zavaras
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?