Arnold v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Plaintiff: Peter Arnold
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Case Number: 1:2009cv00897
Filed: April 17, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Garfield
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Presiding Judge: Philip A. Brimmer
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 135 ORDER: This case is administratively closed. All deadlines and settings are vacated and all pending motions are denied without prejudice. If and when the case is reopened, the parties have leave to re-file their motions. The case may be reopened b y any party or the Court for good cause. Parties shall file, either jointly or separately, a status report within 30 days of any action that would serve to lift the automatic stay in force as a result of Mr. Arnold's bankruptcy proceeding, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/13/10. (ebs, )
July 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 132 Minute ORDER pursuant to 131 Suggestion of Bankruptcy. Pretrial Conference set for 7/19/10 is vacated, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/13/10. (lyg, )
June 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 124 ORDER granting 122 Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. The dispositive motion deadline of June 16, 2010 is vacated, to be reset at a later date if necessary, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/10/10.(ebs, )
April 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 105 MINUTE ORDER granting 103 Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 4/26/2010. Dispositive Motions due by 5/7/2010, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/2/10.(ebs, )
January 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 91 MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 21 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 1/25/10.(ebs, )
January 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER granting 85 Plaintiff's Withdrawal of Combined Motion for Sanctions for Failure to Comply with a Court Order and Motion to Compel Discovery Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37. Denying as having been withdrawn 79 Combined Motion for Sanctions for Failure to Comply With a Court Order and Motion to Compel Discovery Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/15/10.(ebs, )
January 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER granting 61 Plaintiff Peter Arnold's Motion for Determination of Attorney's Fees and Costs. Plaintiff is awarded his reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in bringing the Motion to Compel in the amount of $3,435.75. The award is made jointly and severally against the defendant and its counsel. Defendant and/or its counsel shall satisfy the award by 1/18/2010, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/11/10.(ebs, )
December 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER granting 64 Plaintiff Peter Arnold's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). Clerk shall accept for filing Plaintiff Arnold's Second Amended Complaint [Doc. #64-2], by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/10/09.(ebs, )
November 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER. The Motion to Compel 49 is GRANTED as stated. Wells Fargo shall provide the discovery required by this order on or before 11/16/2009. Discovery Cut-Off: 1/04/2010. Dispositive Motions: 01/18/2010. The final pretrial conference set for 02/02 /2010 is VACATED and RESET to 03/18/2010 at 08:30 A.M., in Courtroom 401. A Final Pretrial Order shall be prepared by the parties and submitted to the court no later than 03/11/2010. The plaintiff is awarded his costs and attorneys fees incurred in making the Motion to Compel, as specified. The Motion for Extension 52 is DENIED as moot. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/06/2009.(sah, )
September 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 43 MINUTE ORDER granting 41 the Plaintiff Peter Arnolds Unopposed Motion to Modify Expert Deadlines in Scheduling Order. The parties shall designate all experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before September 28, 2009, and the parties shall designate all rebuttal experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before October 28, 2009, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/9/09.(bnbcd, )
June 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 8 Motion to Dismiss as moot due to the filing of plaintiff's amended complaint, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 6/10/09. (pabsec)
May 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 7/14/2009 04:00 PM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/8/09. (ebs, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arnold v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peter Arnold
Represented By: Adrienne C. Rowberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Represented By: P. Christian Wolf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?