Loggins v. De Quardo
| Vincent E. Loggins |
| Johe De Quarto, William Steele, Rick Layba, Matthew Martin, Kathlee Eberlene and Steve Shonamaker |
| 1:2009cv00904 |
| April 21, 2009 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Pueblo |
| Zita L. Weinshienk |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY DENIED re 13 Notice of Appeal by Vincent Loggins by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 07/01/09. (bjrsl, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER of Dismissal. Ordered that the habeas corpus application and the amended application are denied and the action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to assert clearly the violation of a federal constitutional right by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 09/19/09. (jjh, ) Modified on 6/25/2009 to correct date document was signed (jjh, ).
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER Directing Applicant to File Second Amended Pleading within 30 days by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 05/06/09. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency. Plaintiff shall have 30 days to; submit a certified copy of his prisoner's trust fund account along with an amended 1915 motion, or pay the filing fee, and submit a Habeas Corpus Petition on the proper court form, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/17/09. (jaksl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
