Schwartz et al v. Booker et al
Plaintiff: Melissa Schwartz, Christina Grafner and Joshua Norris
Defendant: Jefferson County Department of Human Services, Margaret (I) Booker, Margaret Booker, Mary (I) Peagler, Mary Peagler and Denver County Department of Human Services
Case Number: 1:2009cv00915
Filed: April 21, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Wiley Y. Daniel
Presiding Judge: Kathleen M. Tafoya
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 292 ORDER DENYING 290 DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO LIFT STAY AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE. By Judge William J. Martinez on 1/5/2015. (alowe)
August 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 284 ORDER granting 282 The parties Joint Motion for Stay of Phase II of Discovery, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/21/2014.(evana, )
August 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 280 ORDER Plaintiffs Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d) Motion ECF No. 257 is GRANTED; The Court will DELAY ruling on Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment until after the Jefferson County District Court resolves Plaintiffs Rule 60(b) motions. Should the Rule 6 0(b) motions be granted, the parties will be afforded the opportunity to file supplemental summary judgment papers as appropriate; Plaintiffs Amended Objection to Order Denying Plaintiffs Motion to Extend Deadline for Filing Dispositive Motions E CF No. 256 ) is OVERRULED; Plaintiffs Motion to Stay Implementation of Magistrate [Judge]s Order Pending Review by the District Court of Plaintiffs Objection ECF No. 276 is GRANTED; Plaintiffs deadline to file a Phase One dispositive motion i s EXTENDED to August 29, 2014; and Plaintiffs SHALL FILE a status report every 60 daysstarting 60 days from the date of this orderinforming this Court of the current status of the Rule 60(b) motions pending before the Jefferson County District Court, by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/14/2014.(evana, )
July 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 274 ORDER denying 268 Plaintiffs Motion for Stay of Dispositive Motion Deadline, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 7/22/2014.(evana, )
July 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 271 SECOND AMENDED ORDER Resetting Scheduling Conference for 8/12/2014 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Lead counsel for the parties must attend the conference, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 7/18/14. (sgrim)
July 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 264 AMENDED ORDER Resetting Scheduling Conference for 7/28/2014 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Lead counsel for the parties must attend the conference, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 7/16/14. (sgrim)
March 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 219 COURTROOM MINUTES for Motions Hearing held on 3/11/2014 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. ORDERED: Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Expert Report 199 is DENIED. Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs Agai nst Defendants' Counsel Robert A. Wolf for Filing Frivolous Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Expert Report [Doc. No. 199] 208 is DENIED. The parties are permitted to schedule the deposition of Margaret Booker during the month of June 2014, provided there is no extension of the dispositive motions deadline. The discovery cut off date and the dispositive motions deadline remain as scheduled. FTR: S. Grimm - C201. (sgrim)
January 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 198 COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing held on 1/6/2014 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. ORDERED: Discovery deadlines are extended as follows: Discovery cut off - May 8, 2014. Dispositive Motions deadline - June 9, 2014. All other dates remain in effect. Defendants' Motion to Compel and Other Discovery Motions 184 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. FTR: S. Grimm. (sgrim)
July 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 178 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 131 Arapahoe County Department of Human Services Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum ; granting in part and denying in part 134 Jefferson County Human Services Partial Motion to Quash Plaintiffs Sub poena Duces Tecum; granting in part and denying in part 139 Motion to Quash the Non-Party Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action, or, in the Alternative, Motion for Protective Order filed by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment; Arapahoe Countys request for costs from the Plaintiff of $ 235.75 for its production is denied, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 7/15/2013.(ervsl, )
June 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 169 COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing held on 6/10/2013 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. ORDERED: Araphoe County Department of Human Services' Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum 131 is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. Jefferson County Human Services' Partial Motion to Quash Plaintiffs' Subpoena Duces Tecum 134 is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. Colorado Department of Public Health and Environments Motion to Quash the Non-Party Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, Or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action, or, in the Alternative, motion for Protective Order 139 is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. City and County of Denver, Department of Human Services Motion to Quash and Modify Plaintiffs 9; Subpoena Duces Tecum 136 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; issues regarding production of Chandler Grafner's files, as redacted, are moot as the file has been produced without further court findings. Denver County Department of Hu man Services shall produce the requested documents, as stated on record. The documents related to policies and procedures shall be limited to those otherwise relevant and responsive policies and procedures which were in effect during January 1, 200 6 through May 7, 2007. Given that the parties are in phase 1 of the discovery process wherein the status of Chandler Grafner during the relevant period is the primary issue, the otherwise relevant and responsive emails requested in the subpoena will be produced only for the time period January 2007 through November 7, 2007, without prejudice to the Plaintiff to request emails for later periods if necessary and also without prejudice to the City and County's ability to object to such production if raised. FTR: S. Grimm. (sgrim)
March 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 106 ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CASE, pending disposition by the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit of the Interlocutory Appeal, by Judge William J. Martinez on 3/26/2012. (ervsl, )
December 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 100 ORDER denying 88 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss based on qualified immunity; Denying as moot 89 Defendants' Motion to Stay by Judge William J. Martinez on 12/6/2011.(ervsl, )
June 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER granting 76 Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend Plaintiffs Complaint; Plaintiffs proposed Amended Complaint 82 is accepted as filed; denying as moot 41 Defendants Motion for Reconsideration ; Not later than June 29, 2011, the parties are to jointly contact Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoyas chambers regarding the prompt setting of a scheduling conference. by Judge William J. Martinez on 6/28/2011.(erv, )
May 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER Discharging 67 Order to Show Cause, Plaintiffs 70 Motion for Leave to File Response Out of Time is GRANTED; Plaintiffs substantive Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss 13 shall be filed not later than May 25, 2011; and Defendants Reply (if any) shall be filed not later than June 8, 2011 by Judge William J. Martinez on 5/19/2011. (erv, )
May 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER granting Defendant Jefferson County Department of Human Services 46 Motion to Dismiss and all claims against Jefferson County Department of Human Services are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Defendant Denver County Department of Human Services Rene wed 47 Motion to Dismiss is Granted all claims against Denver County Department of Human Services are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Defendant Mary Peagler and Margaret Bookers Renewed Motion to Dismiss 47 is GRANTED. Claims against Mary Peagler and Margaret Booker in their official capacities are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, by Judge William J. Martinez on 5/16/11.(lsw, )
February 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER. The parties are directed to confer and to file, on or before 2/23/2011, a Joint Status Report. By Judge William J. Martinez on 2/14/2011(sah, )
April 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MINUTE ORDER STRIKING 39 Defendants Margaret Booker and Mary Peaglers Motion to Reconsider Order Dismissing Their Motion to Dismiss the Claims Against Them Individually, with leave to re-file in compliance with D.C.COLO.LCIVR 7.1A. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 4/13/2010.(erv, )
March 31, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER that Defendant Jefferson County Department of Human Services Combined Motion and Brief to Dismiss Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P 12(b)(1) and 12 (b)(5) 9 , Defendant Denver Department of Human Services Motion to Dismiss 10 and Margaret Booker an d Mary Peaglers Combined Motion and Brief to Dismiss the Fifth and Sixth Claims for Relief 13 are DENIED with leave to re-file. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall engage in limited discovery as set forth by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 3/31/2010.(erv, )
July 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER granting 15 Joint MOTION to Stay Discovery by Defendants. Discovery shall be stayed pending ruling by the District Court on the Motions to Dismiss. Should any portion of the case remain for trial subsequent to the District Courts ruling on the Motions to Dismiss, he parties shall file a status report within ten days of the ruling requesting the matter be set for a scheduling conference by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 7/10/09.(kmtcd)
June 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 18 Motion to Stay of the Briefing Schedule Pertaining to Defendants Motion to Dismiss and for an Extension of Time Within Which to Respond to Defendants Motions. Plaintiffs shall respond to Defendan ts Motions to Dismiss 9 , 10 , filed May 11, 2009, not later than Monday, June 29, 2009. Should a stay of the briefing schedule become necessary due to the resolution of the motion to stay discovery, Plaintiffs may file another motion. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 6/1/09.(erv, )
April 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 7/16/2009 10:15 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/29/09. (erv, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schwartz et al v. Booker et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Schwartz
Represented By: Jere Kyle Bachus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christina Grafner
Represented By: Jere Kyle Bachus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua Norris
Represented By: Jere Kyle Bachus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jefferson County Department of Human Services
Represented By: Writer Mott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Margaret (I) Booker
Represented By: Niels Loechell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Margaret Booker
Represented By: Niels Loechell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mary (I) Peagler
Represented By: Niels Loechell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mary Peagler
Represented By: Niels Loechell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Denver County Department of Human Services
Represented By: Niels Loechell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?