Aldana v. CitiFinancial, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jorge Aldana
Defendant: CitiFinancial, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2009cv00976
Filed: April 29, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Denver
Presiding Judge: Marcia S. Krieger
Presiding Judge: Craig B. Shaffer
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 20 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 12 MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION. Citifinancial's 12 Motion to Compel Arbitration is GRANTED. The parties will immediate commence proceedings to arbitrate the claims in this action consistent with the terms of Citi financial's policies. Pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 3, this action is STAYED until that arbitration is completed. Because the Court does not anticipate the need for further rulings in this action, the Clerk of the Court shall close this case for administrative purposes, subject to either party moving to reopen it for good cause, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 02/12/2010.(wjc, ) Modified on 2/16/2010 to correct text date (wjc, ).
July 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER granting in part 13 Defendant's Motion to Vacate Scheduling Conference and Related Deadlines. The Scheduling Conference set for 08/11/2009 at 10:00 AM (Mountain Time) is converted to a Status Conference set for 8/11/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 07/22/09.(wjc, ) Modified on 7/24/2009 to add text in part (wjc, ).
June 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER setting scheduling conference. ORDERED that a Scheduling Conference will be held on 8/11/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 6/11/09. (cbssec)
May 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 5/8/09. (mskcd)
May 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Drawing Case. Ordered that this case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 05/04/2009. (sah, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aldana v. CitiFinancial, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jorge Aldana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CitiFinancial, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?