Muhammad v. Wiley
Petitioner: Elijah Hakeem Muhammad
Respondent: Ron Wiley
Case Number: 1:2009cv00979
Filed: April 29, 2009
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Fremont
Presiding Judge: Zita L. Weinshienk
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Ordered that the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal is effective as of 05/22/09 by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 06/03/09. (jjh, )
April 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 1 ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency. Applicant shall have 30 days to pay the filing fee or submit a 1915 motion, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/27/09. (jak, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Muhammad v. Wiley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Elijah Hakeem Muhammad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ron Wiley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?