Hirschfeld v. 1111 Tower, LLC et al
A. Barry Hirschfeld, Jr. |
1111 Tower, LLC and Land Title Guarantee Company |
1:2009cv01008 |
May 1, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
XX Outside US |
Walker D. Miller |
Kristen L. Mix |
Plaintiff |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1701 Interstate Land Sales Disclosure Act-15 USC:1701 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL pursuant to the Stipulation for Dismissal in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). The complaint is dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay his or its own costs and attorneys' fees, by Judge Walker D. Miller on 11/2/09. (ebs, ) |
Filing 37 ORDER denying 17 Defendant 1111 Tower LLC's Motion to Stay Pending Arbitration, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 8/24/09.(gmssl, ) |
Filing 34 ORDER re 21 Stipulated Motion for Order Regarding Defendant Land Title Guarantee Company. IT IS ORDERED: Land Title Guarantee Company shall continue to hold the $192,488 received from A. Barry Hirschfeld, Jr. in accordance with the parties esc row agreement; Land Title Guarantee Company shall be bound by any order of this court regarding distribution of said escrow funds; and Absent court order, Land Title Guarantee Company shall not be required to attend any pre-trial proceedings or trial. The parties shall continue to serve Land Title Guarantee Company with copies of all pleadings. by Judge Walker D. Miller on 8/17/09.(erv, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.