Quraishi v. No Defendants Named
Plaintiff: Qudsia Quraishi
Defendant: No Defendants Named
Case Number: 1:2009cv01074
Filed: May 8, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Boulder
Presiding Judge: Michael E. Hegarty
Presiding Judge: Zita L. Weinshienk
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER. The Recommendation dated 03/10/2010 41 is accepted and adopted in its entirety. Defendants Motion To Dismiss 17 treated as a motion for summary judgment, is granted. Defendant Gary Locke is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Ci v. P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Complaint and cause of action are dismissed, the parties to pay their own costs and attorneys fees. A separate Judgment shall issue pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a). By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 04/15/2010.(sah, )
November 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 26 Defendants Unopposed Motion to Stay Discovery. The Unopposed Motion to Stay Discovery originally filed by Defendant 23 , filed 11/19/2009, is denied as moot. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/24/2009.(sah, )
November 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MINUTE ORDER denying 23 Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Stay Discovery as duplicative. The actual document filed is a duplicate of the Motion to Dismiss filed on 11/16/2009. If he wishes to, the Defendant may re-file an actual motion requesting a stay of discovery. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/20/2009. (mehcd)
November 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 21 NOTICE of Coversion to Summary Judgment re: 17 Defendants Motion to Dismiss. Defendant has filed the motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and wishes to support the motion with documents outside the pleadings, it is proper to inform the part ies that the Court will convert the Motion to Dismiss into a Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. Plaintiff shall file a response to the motion on or before 12/10/2009. Defendant may file a reply to the Plaintiffs response within fifteen (15) days after the response is filed. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/17/2009. (sah, )
June 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Plaintiff, within 30 days to file and amended complaint, re 1 Complaint filed by Qudsia Quraishi. Clerk to mail this order and 2 copies of the court approved complaint form, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 6/4/09. (gmssl, ) Modified on 6/5/2009 to correct spelling error (gmssl, ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Quraishi v. No Defendants Named
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Qudsia Quraishi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: No Defendants Named
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?