Colorado Rail Passenger Association v. Federal Transit Administration
| Colorado Rail Passenger Association |
| Federal Transit Administration |
| 1:2009cv01135 |
| May 18, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| John L. Kane |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
ORDER the Court AFFIRMS the October 18, 2008 Record of Decision. Judgment shall be entered forthwith in favor of Defendant, by Judge William J. Martinez on 12/30/2011. (ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER. Joint Status Report due by 2/23/2011, by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/14/11. (gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER. Denver Union Station Project Authoritys Motion To Dismiss 73 filed 3/16/2010, is GRANTED. Regional Transportation Districts Motion To Dismiss Amended Complaint for Injunctive Relief Under NEPA 76 filed 3/17/2010, is GRANTED. The Amended C omplaint for Injunctive Relief Under NEPA and CRCP 65 Against Denver Union Station Project Authority and Regional Transportation District and Those Acting in Concert Therewith 62 filed 3/12/2010, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Defendants, Regional Transportation District and Denver Union Station Project Authority, are DROPPED as named parties to this action, and the case caption AMENDED according. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/15/2010.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND RULE 26(f) PLANNING MEETING: Scheduling Conference set for 4/26/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/2/2010. (kmtcd, )
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER. In light of the order 54 consolidating the above-captioned cases, I direct that the caption of these consolidated cases be amended and simplified. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 04/01/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
82
MINUTE ORDER. Federal Transit Administrations Unopposed Motion For Leave To File a Sur-Reply 81 filed 03/24/2010 is GRANTED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 03/29/2010.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER denying 63 Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by Judge John L. Kane on 03/18/2010.(wjc, )
|
|
Filing
79
Minute Entry for Evidentiary Hearing proceedings held before Judge John L. Kane on 3/17/2010. Taking under advisement 63 Motion for TRO. (Court Reporter Kara Spitler) (babia)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER. The planitiffs Complaint for Injunctive Relief Under NEPA and CRCP 65, and Emergency Motion and Memorandum in Support for a Temporary Restraining Order 1 filed 03/01/2010, is DENIED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 03/03/2010. The complain t and motion was filed in Civil Action No.10-cv-00462, which case now is consolidated with Civil Action No. 09-cv-01135. Order 54 , filed 03/02/2010, in Civil Action No. 09-cv-00462. I deny the motion for temporary restraining order on both procedural and substantive grounds. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 03/03/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER of Consolidation. Granting 51 Forthwith Motion to Consolidate. 10-cv-00462 shall be consolidated with 09-cv-01135. Consolidated action to be removed from the AP docket for immediate assignment to a judge, by Judge John L. Kane on 3/2/10.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
50
MINUTE ORDER granting 45 Colorado Department of Transportation's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Brief. Amicus Curiae Brief is accepted for filing. Terminating Document 47 as it is a proposed order and not an additional motion, by Judge John L. Kane on 2/26/10.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER granting 18 Regional Transportion District's Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief, by Judge John L. Kane on 10/9/09.(gms, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER re: 14 Federal Transit Administration's ("FTA") Unopposed Motion for Leave to Submit the AR on CD and to be Excused from Filing th AR Electronically. The FTA is excused from filing the AR electronically on the Court's ECF system. The FTA shall submit one or more CDs with the contents of the AR. FTA may serve the AR in the same manner. By Judge John L. Kane on 09/03/2009.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER granting 11 Joint Motion for Briefing Schedule. Administrative Record due by 9/11/09; Plaintiff's Opening Brief due by 11/18/2009; Defendant's Response Brief due by 12/20/2009; Plaintiff Reply Brief due by 1/4/2010; and a Sur-Reply, if needed, will be due by 1/14/2010 by Judge John L. Kane on 8/20/09.(lam, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Colorado Rail Passenger Association v. Federal Transit Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Colorado Rail Passenger Association | |
| Represented By: | Philipp C. Theune |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Federal Transit Administration | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
