Wake v. Maher et al
Plaintiff: Richard C. Wake
Defendant: Theodore (I) James Maher and Theodore James Maher
Case Number: 1:2009cv01224
Filed: May 27, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Denver
Presiding Judge: Kathleen M. Tafoya
Presiding Judge: Zita L. Weinshienk
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Joint Stipulated Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice. 32 is GRANTED. Defendant City and County of Denver is dimissed with prejudice and the entirety of the within action is dismissed with prejudice, each Party to bear his or its own costs and attorney fees. By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 12/16/2009. (sah, )
October 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER granting 29 Combined Stipulated Motion for Substitution of Defendant City and County of Denver and Dismissal with Prejudice of Defendant Maher and Stipulated Motion to Amend Caption. City and County of Denver, Colorado is substituted as party defendant. Defendant Maher is dismissed with prejudice, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 10/23/09.(gms, )
September 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 27 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/9/09. (kmtcd)
September 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 23 Minute ORDER denying 21 Stipulated MOTION for Protective Order by Plaintiff Richard C. Wake, Defendants Theodore (I) James Maher, Theodore James Maher without prejudice, and the proposed Protective Order is REFUSED by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/2/09.(kmtcd)
August 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER RESETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Settlement Conference reset for 10/9/2009 08:30 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/26/09. (kmtcd)
August 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Settlement Conference set for 11/24/2009 01:30 PM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/25/09. (kmtcd)
June 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 8/25/2009 10:15 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 6/4/09. (gmssl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wake v. Maher et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard C. Wake
Represented By: Scott Charles LaBarre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Theodore (I) James Maher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Theodore James Maher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?