BIAX Corporation v. NVIDIA Corporation et al
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Defendant: NVIDIA Corporation, Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc., Sony Electronics Inc., Sony Corporation of America and Sony Corporation
Case Number: 1:2009cv01257
Filed: May 29, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Boulder
Presiding Judge: Philip A. Brimmer
Presiding Judge: Michael E. Hegarty
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 1114 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice the following motions: 1111 Sony Defendants' Renewed Motion for Issuance of a Writ of Execution and 1112 NVIDIA Corporation's Renewed Motion for Issuance of a Writ of Execution. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/10/2013. (mehcd)
September 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 1104 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 1099 Defendant Sony's Motion for Issuance of Writ of Execution, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/16/2013. (mehcd)
August 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 1077 ORDER. NVIDIA is awarded $1,283,030.77 in attorney's fees and $28,648.24 in non-taxable costs. The Sony defendants are awarded $688,773 in attorney's fees and $10,913 in non-taxable costs. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/12/13. (mnfsl, )
March 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 1037 ORDER: Defendants' Motion for Recovery of Attorneys' Fees and Expenses Incurred After Claim Construction 981 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendants are entitled to an award of fees and costs incurred between June 23, 2011 and March 26, 2012, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285, in an amount to be determined in a subsequent order. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/30/13.(pabsec)
August 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 1025 MINUTE ORDER granting 1023 Motion for Leave for Ulysses S. Hui to Withdraw as Counsel for Defendant NVIDIA Corporation. Attorney Ulysses S. Hui is hereby terminated. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/13/2012. (mehcd)
May 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 996 ORDER denying 989 plaintiff's motion to defer. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/30/12.(mnfsl, )
March 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 947 ORDER. Defendants' counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice. Pursuant to the Court's 2/15/2012 941 Order, judgment shall enter in favor of defendants and against plaintiff on all of plaintiff's claims. Defendants may have their costs pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. All 728 , 730 , 733 pending motions are denied as moot and this case shall be closed in its entirety. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/26/12.(mnfsl, )
February 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 941 ORDER. The 729 motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc. and Sony Electronics Inc. is granted. The 876 , 887 motion for summary judgment filed by defendant NVIDIA Corporation is granted. All of pl aintiff's claims are dismissed and the only remaining claims in this action are defendants' counterclaims. Those 723 , 726 , 727 , 731 , 734 , 735 , 879 pending motions and objections which relate only to the issue of infringement a nd damages resulting therefrom are deemed moot. Within ten days of entry of this order, the parties shall file briefs not exceeding five pages addressing whether the Court should exercise jurisdiction over defendants' counterclaims. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 2/15/12.(mnfsl, )
December 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 920 MINUTE ORDER granting 916 Motion for Reconsideration of Minute Order Striking Plaintiff BIAX Corporation's Response in Opposition to Defendant NVIDIA's [Corrected] Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement. The December 5, 2011 Min ute Order 915 striking plaintiff's response 911 to defendant NVIDIA's motion for summary judgment is vacated. The Clerk is instructed to remove the word "stricken" from Docket Nos. 911 and 913 .By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/7/11.(pabcd)
October 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 870 ORDER re: 855 Order on Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Late-Produced Evidence and Expert Testimony that Relies on Such Evidence, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/25/2011. (mehcd)
October 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 868 ORDER. NVIDIA's 666 , 669 Motion for Leave to File a Further Summary Judgment Motion and 685 , 688 Amended Notice of Motion for Leave to File a Further Summary Judgment Motion are granted. NVIDIA may file a motion for summary judgment on or before 11/2/2011, such motion not to exceed twenty pages. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 10/18/11.(mnfsl, )
October 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 855 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 732 Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Late-Produced Evidence and Expert Testimony that Relies on Such Evidence, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/4/2011. (mehcd)
August 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 751 ORDER SETTING CASE FOR TRIAL. Ten-day Jury Trial set for 6/4/2012 at 08:00 AM in Courtroom A 701 before Judge Philip A. Brimmer. Trial Preparation Conference set for 5/18/2012 at 01:30 PM before Judge Philip A. Brimmer. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/17/11. (mnfsl, )
April 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 664 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 612 NVIDIA Corporation's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs Regarding Deposition of Edward Davidson, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/5/2011. (mehcd)
March 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 663 ORDER denying Defendant NVIDIA Corporation's 330 326 Motion for Summary Judgment, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/30/11.(lsw, )
March 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 648 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 619 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel the Sony Defendants to Produce Certain Financial Information, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 3/2/201. (mehcd)
February 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 623 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 487 Defendant Sony's Combined Motion and Memorandum to Strike New Infringement Theories as Untimely. Fact discovery is closed for all purposes other than those specifically identified by the Court in its 2/7/2011 order. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/8/2011. (mehcd)
February 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 621 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 566 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel NVIDIA to Produce Additional Witness for Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition and for Sanctions and Expedited Consideration, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/7/2011. (mehcd)
January 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 600 ORDER granting 583 Defendant NVIDIA's Motion to Clarify the Court's January 5, 2011, Discovery Order, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/26/2011. (mehcd)
January 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 574 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 481 ( 478 ) Defendant NVIDIACorporation's Motion to Strike the Declaration of Edward Davidson for Abusive Deposition Conduct. Defendant NVIDIA may file a motion for its fees and costs consistent with the requirements of D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A and 54.3 on or before 1/31/2011. If Defendant NVIDIA chooses to conduct an additional deposition of Dr. Davidson, such deposition shall be completed on or before 1/31/2011, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/7/11.(mnf, )
January 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 573 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 500 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel NVIDIA to Produce for Deposition Rule 30(b)(6) Witnesses. The discovery ordered herein shall be completed on or before 2/4/2011. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/5/2011. (mehcd)
December 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 571 MINUTE ORDER denying 566 Plaintiff's request for expedited briefing of its Motion to Compel.... The Court sets the following briefing schedule: Defendant NVIDIA shall respond on or before January 11, 2011. Plaintiff may reply on or before January 21, 2011. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/28/2010. (mehcd)
December 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 550 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 535 Plaintiff's Motion Modify Scheduling Order to Extend Expert Deadlines, and denying as moot 547 Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Consideration of its Motion to Modify Scheduling Order to Ext end Expert Deadlines. Fact discovery remains set for 1/11/2011. Initial expert disclosures due by 2/11/2011. Rebuttal expert disclosures due 3/11/2011. Expert discovery due by 4/11/2011. Dispositive Motions due by 4/11/2011. Final Pretrial Conference RESET for 4/14/2011 at 9:45 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/10/2010. (mehcd)
November 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 523 ORDER granting in part and denying without prejudice in part 383 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Sony to Produce for Deposition Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Witness; and granting in part and denying in part 457 Defendant Sony's Motion for Clarification by the Magistrate Judge of September 21, 2010 Order. Fact discovery is extended up to and including 1/11/2010 for the sole purpose of the discovery ordered herein. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/23/2010. (mehcd)
November 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 519 Courtroom Minutes/Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Motion Hearing held on 11/22/2010, taking under advisement 383 Plaintiff's to Compel Sony to Produce for Deposition Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Witnes ses, 457 Sony's Motion for Clarification by the Magistrate Judge of the September 21, 2010 Order, and 500 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Nvidia to Produce for Deposition Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Witnesses. (FTR: C. Coomes - Courtroom C-203) (mehcd)
October 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 455 ORDER denying 335 Defendants' Motion for Clarification of Claim Constructions to Incorporate Statement Made in the Claim Construction Order, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 10/28/10.(ebs, )
October 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 438 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 362 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel NVIDIA to produce Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Witnesses, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/14/2010. (mehcd)
October 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 435 MINUTE ORDER granting 428 Defendant NVIDIA Corporation's Motion for Partial Stay Pending Objection to Discovery Order by Magistrate Judge, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/13/2010. (mehcd)
September 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 388 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 226 Plaintiff BIAX's Motion to Compel Responses to First Set of Interrogatories and Second Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things; granting in part and denying in part 234 Plaintiff BIAX's Motion to Compel NVIDIA to Respond to Plaintiff's Third Set of Interrogatories and Fourth Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things; and granting in part and denying in part 235 Plaintiff BIAX's Motion to Compel the Sony Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Third Set of Interrogatories and Fourth Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things, By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/21/2010. (mehcd)
September 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 385 Courtroom Minutes/Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Telephonic Motion Hearing held on 9/20/2010, granting in part and denying in part 343 Plaintiff's Motion to Modify Scheduling Order to Extend Disco very Cutoff. Fact Discovery due by 10/15/2010. Initial Expert Disclosures due by 10/20/2010. Rebuttal Expert Disclosures due by 11/29/2010. Expert Discovery due by 12/31/2010. Dispositive Motions due by 12/31/2010. (Court Reporter FTR - C. Coomes) (mehcd)
July 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 307 ORDER REGARDING BIA1 040052-53 AND BIA1 039751-52: Plaintiff shall produce BIA1 040052-53 to Defendants and shall amend its proffered privilege log regarding BIA1 039751-52 within five business days of the final effect of this order. The effect of this order is hereby stayed for ten days pending appeal. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 7/22/2010. (mehcd)
July 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 300 Courtroom Minutes/Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Telephonic Motions Hearing held on 7/14/2010, denying 222 (sealed document #219) Motion to Compel; denying without prejudice 233 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify; granting in part and denying without prejudice in part 241 (sealed document #236) Motion to Compel; granting 253 Motion to Seal. Status Report due by 7/23/2010. (Court Reporter FTR - C. Coomes) (mehcd)
June 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 231 ORDER REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION: The patent claim terms presently at issue shall be construed as set forth in this Order, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 6/21/10. (ebs, )
May 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 199 ORDER granting 197 Motion for Clarification of Scheduling Order, etc., to the extent it seeks clarification of the Scheduling Order, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/7/2010. (mehcd)
April 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 175 Minute ORDER granting 161 Motion to Submit a Video Technology Tutorial. Parties may submit tutorials on or before 5/10/10, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/20/10.(jak, )
April 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 167 MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 111 Plaintiff BIAX's Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Defendant Nvidia; granting in part and denying in part 115 Plaintiff BIAX's Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Defendants Sony; granting in part and denying in part 116 Defendants' Motion to Compel Interrogatory Response and Production of Documents. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/14/2010. (mehcd)
April 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 160 PRELIMINARY ORDER REGARDING DISCLOSURE OF THE 10/8/2008 LIVINGSTONE DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT: This Order communicates the preliminary determination of the Court as to disclosure of the deposition, and the Court is inclined to allow disclosure of pages 26-29, 38-39, 62-65, and 70-73 of the deposition transcript of Mr. Livingstone dated 10/28/2008. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/1/2010. (mehcd)
March 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 142 MINUTE ORDER granting 126 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to File Plaintiff's Position Statement and Motion for Protective Order Regarding Duplicative Depositions Under Seal. Granting 128 Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Leave to Fil e Under Seal. Clerk shall maintain under seal the documents at Dockets ##127, 129, and 131. Granting in part and denying in part 134 Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order Regarding Duplicative Depositions, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 3/17/10.(ebs, )
February 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 120 Courtroom Minutes/Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Motion Hearing held on 2/11/2010, granting 98 Defendants' Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Prior Litigation. Plaintiff shall produce the entire hard drive requested on or before 2/17/2010. (Court Reporter FTR - C. Coomes) (mehcd)
October 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 90 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/13/2009. (mehcd)
October 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER denying 75 Plaintiff BIAX Corporation's Motion for Entry of Protective Order. Granting 76 Defendants' Motion for Protective Order. Defendants shall submit their proposed protective order on or before 10/8/2009, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/5/09.(ebs, )
September 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER granting 60 Stipulated Motion Regarding Dismissal of Certain Sony Defendants and Discovery, to the extent referred and Orders the stipulations as set forth in this Order, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/10/09.(ebs, )
September 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER granting in part 60 Parties' Stipulated Motion Regarding Dismissal of Certain Sony Defendants and Discovery. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), plaintiff BIAX Corporations claims against defendants Sony Corporation, Sony Computer Entert ainment Inc., and Sony Corporation of America are dismissed without prejudice. Pursuant to agreement of the parties, Sony Corporation, Sony Computer Entertainment Inc., and Sony Corporation of America shall be jointly and severally liable for the pa yment of any judgment that the Court may enter in this case in favor of plaintiff BIAX Corporation and against defendants Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. and Sony Electronics Inc. Future filings in this action shall omit Sony Corporation, Sony Computer Entertainment Inc., and Sony Corporation of America from the case caption, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/9/09.(ebs, )
September 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER On or before 9/9/2009, Defendants shall notify the Court whether they request the Court to enter the proposed order attached to their stipulated motion 60 not under seal. The stipulated motion 60 is referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty to the extent that it pertains to discovery in this action, namely, with respect to the relief requested in paragraphs 2, 3, 5, and 6, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/2/09. (ebs, )
August 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER granting 45 Defendants' Motion for Entry of Order Setting Markman Briefing and Hearing Schedule and for Related Relief. Issues pertaining to claim construction shall be briefed according to the schedule set forth in this Order. Markman Hearing set for 5/27/2010 08:30 AM in Courtroom A 701 before Judge Philip A. Brimmer, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/12/09.(ebs, )
June 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER SETTING HEARING UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 16: In Court Hearing set for 7/30/2009 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom A 601 before Judge Philip A. Brimmer, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 6/9/09. (ebs, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BIAX Corporation v. NVIDIA Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Represented By: Steven J. Merker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NVIDIA Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sony Electronics Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sony Corporation of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sony Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?