Stienmier v. Schofield et al
Plaintiff: Saundra Stienmier
Defendant: Dan Schofield, Karl Doenges, Michael B. Donley and Department of the Air Force
Case Number: 1:2009cv01260
Filed: May 29, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Douglas
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Presiding Judge: Wiley Y. Daniel
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER granting 44 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 10/06/2010.(wjc, )
April 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 45 MOTION to Stay Discovery Pending Disposition of 44 Motion to Dismiss For Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction by Defendant. Defendant is ORDERED to permit Plaintiff to review Ms. Stienmiers Equal Oppor tunity file as well as any documents from Ms. Stienmiers Official Personnel File that are relevant to the issue of Plaintiffs exhaustion of administrative remedies. Such review shall takeplace no later than April 27, 2010. Plaintiff shall file his re sponse to Defendants Motion to Dismiss no later than May 4, 2010. The Motion to Stay Discovery is granted insofar as all other discovery is STAYED untilthe court rules on Defendants Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction 44 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/20/2010.(kmtcd, )
January 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER granting 39 MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify Scheduling Order by Plaintiff by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 1/12/2010.(kmtcd, )
January 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 36 Minute ORDER granting 26 MOTION for Leave to Amend Complaint by Plaintiff. The Amended Complaint and Demand for Trial by Jury 27 is accepted and shall be the operative complaint. Denying as moot 11 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendants by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 1/5/2010.(kmtcd, ) (Modified on 1/6/2010 corrected link to Amended Complaint,and spacing)(erv, ).
December 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER AND ORDER OF REFERENCE: Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland is designated to convene such settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case. The 2 Order of Reference to United States Magistrate Judge entered by Chief Judge Daniel is VACATED. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/14/2010 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 12/17/2009. (wjc, )
November 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER. The Joint Motion to Lift Stay 22 , filed 11/20/2009, is GRANTED and the stay previously imposed in this case is lifted. A Response to Defendants Partial Motion to Dismiss 11 shall be filed no later than 12/11/2009. By Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 11/20/2009.(sah, )
September 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER: granting 14 Joint Motion to Stay Action. Status Report due by 10/23/2009, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/25/09.(bnbcd, )
June 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 8/7/2009 11:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/5/09. (erv, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stienmier v. Schofield et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Saundra Stienmier
Represented By: David H. Wollins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dan Schofield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Karl Doenges
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael B. Donley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of the Air Force
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?