Jones v. Cowens
| Ivan Jones |
| Todd Cowens |
| 1:2009cv01274 |
| June 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Arapahoe |
| Marcia S. Krieger |
| Michael J. Watanabe |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Mr. Cowens' Motion to Dismiss (# 29 ), which the Court has converted to a motion for summary judgment, is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of Mr. Cowens and shall close this case, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 08/19/2012.(wjcsl, )
|
|
Filing
24
TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER - CIVIL by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 6/30/11. (msksec, )
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 6/30/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. Incarcerated plaintiff shall appear by telephone. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 5/2/2011. (mjwcd)
|
|
Filing
17
Opinion and ORDER Granting, in Part, Motion for Summary Judgment. Granting in part and denying in part 13 Defendant's Motion to Strike and Motion for Summary Judgment. The Defendant is entitled to judgment in his favor as to any tort claims by the Plaintiff and any damages claim for mental injury or emotional suffering. However, the Court declines to grant judgment on the 8th Amendment claim, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 8/12/10.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 7/1/09. (mskcd)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER Granting Service by United States Marshal by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 06/29/09. (wjc, )
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER DRAWING CASE. Ordered that this case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 06/24/2009. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency. Plaintiff shall have 30 days to file a complaint with an original signature, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/1/09. (jak, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. Cowens | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ivan Jones | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Todd Cowens | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
