Johnson v. Executive Director of the C.D.O.C., The et al
| Ronald Johnson |
| (I) Executive Director of the C.D.O.C., The, Executive Director of the C.D.O.C., The, Kevin (I) Milyard, Kevin Milyard, Terry (I) Bartruff, Terry Bartruff, Lloyd (I) Waide, Lloyd Waide, Jeff (I) Revord, Jeff Revord, Raymond (I) Higgins, Raymond Higgins, Gary (I) Little, Gary Little, Robert (I) Keisel, Robert Keisel, Shawn (I) Rewoldt, Shawn Rewoldt, Carol (I) Soares, Carol Soares, Kenneth (I) Wildenstein, Kenneth Wildenstein, Mary (I) Cox-Bergman and Mary Cox-Bergman |
| 1:2009cv01313 |
| June 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Logan |
| Zita L. Weinshienk |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER. Defendants Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) ( 18 filed in Case No. 09-cv-01147) is GRANTED. Defendants Motion to Dismiss Complaint Filed by Plaintiff Palecek Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) ( 26 filed in Case No. 09- cv-01147) (Plaintiff Palecek has joined the objections to the Magistrate Judges Recommendations filed by Plaintiffs Braxton, Graves, and Johnson) is GRANTED. Defendants Motion to Dismiss Complaint filed by Plaintiff Michael Johnson ( 28 filed in Case No. 09-cv-01147) (he too joins the objections to the Magistrate Judges Recommendations) is GRANTED. Defendants Motion to Dismiss ( 15 filed in Case No. 09-cv-01313) is GRANTED. Defendants Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) ( 24 filed in Case No. 09-cv-01218) is GRANTED. The above action is DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 02/01/2010.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
28
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge: It is RECOMMENDED that 15 Defendants Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED.Plaintiffs claims be dismissed in their entirety, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 12/11/2009. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER. The following four cases- Graves v. Executive Director of the CDOC, 09-cv-01218-PAB-CBS; Johnson v. Executive Director of the CDOC, 09-cv-01313- REB-MEH; Palecek v. Executive Director of the CDOC, 09-cv-01352-ZLW-CBS; and Johnson v. Zavaras, E xecutive Director of the CDOC, 09-cv-01553-MSK-MEH shall be assigned to meand consolidated with this case for all further purposes. The Orders of Reference to Magistrate Judges previously issued in Case Nos. 09-cv-01218-LTB-KMT, 09-cv-01313-LTB-KLM, 09-cv-01552-LTB-KMT, and 09-cv-01553-LTB-KMT are WITHDRAWN and these cases are REASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1. All five cases shall hereafter be designated as Civil Action No. 09-cv-01147-LTB-KMT, and all pleadings and other filings shall be filed in this case only. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 09/25/2009. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
22
MINUTE ORDER granting 19 Defendants' Motion to Vacate Preliminary Scheduling Conference. The parties shall submit a status report within three (3) business days of a ruling on the pending consolidation issue. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/8/2009. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER REQUIRING SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 06/24/2009. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER Drawing Case. Ordered that this case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 06/22/2009. (sah, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
