Bradley v. Hartley
| Tommie Charles Bradley, Jr. |
| Steven Hartley |
| 1:2009cv01343 |
| June 9, 2009 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Fremont |
| Robert S Carr |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER to Cure Deficiency re 51 Notice of Appeal by Tommie Bradley Jr., appellant has 30 days to either pay the filing fee or file a 1915 motion with district court by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 06/15/11. (bjrsl, )
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER. The Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is denied. Court also denies a certificate of appealability, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 6/2/11. (gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER FOR STATE COURT TRANSCRIPTS. Within 30 days from the date of this order the Respondents shall file with the Clerk of the Court a complete copy of the transcripts of all proceedings conducted in El Paso County District Court Case No. 96CR1162, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 05/03/2011. (wjc, )
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER FOR STATE COURT RECORDS. On or before 08/30/2010, the Clerk of the Combined Court for El Paso County shall provide to this Court the original written record, including transcripts, of the El Paso District Court Case No. 96CR1162, People v. Bradley. By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 07/21/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER: denying 37 Applicants Motion Requesting Transfer. Warden Hoyt Brill shall be substituted as a respondent for Warden Steve Hartley, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/1/10.(bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
28
MINUTE ORDER: denying 26 Applicants Motion to Proceed With Proceedings Due to Respondents Failure to File Their Answer Brief, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/22/10.(bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER Drawing Case To A District Judge and to a Magistrate Judge. The Application, including all five claims, shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 09/14/2009. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 20 days Respondents shall file a Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 20 days of the filing of the Pre-Answer Response Applicant may file a Reply by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 06/16/09. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
1
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiency. Applicant has 30 days to; pay the filing fee or file a 1915 motion, and file a petition on the proper court form, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/5/09. (jak, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bradley v. Hartley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Tommie Charles Bradley, Jr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Steven Hartley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
