Fields v. Department of Treasury
| Diane K. Fields and Ronald Kelly |
| Department of Treasury |
| 1:2009cv01401 |
| June 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Arapahoe |
| Philip A. Brimmer |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| None |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Right to Privacy Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
Courtroom Minutes/Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: granting in part and denying in part 11 Defendant's Motion to Stay Discovery. Scheduling Conference held on 10/7/2009. Discovery due by 5/7/2010. Dispositive Motions due by 6/7/2010. Settlement Conference set for 11/12/2009 09:00 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Confidential Settlement Statements due by 11/5/2009. Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/9/2010 09:30 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (Court Reporter FTR - C. Coomes) (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to the 10 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice as to Plaintiff Diane K. Fields. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), all claims asserted in this matter by plaintiff Diane Fields are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/24/09. (ebs, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
