Reeves v. Trani et al
Petitioner: Shawn M. Reeves
Respondent: Travis Trani and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Case Number: 1:2009cv01434
Filed: June 19, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Lincoln
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER. The Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254 2 filed on 6/19/2009, by Applicant Shawn M. Reeves is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. There is no basis on which to issue a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/22/2011. (sah, )
July 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER TO FORWARD ALL RECORDS AND TRANSCRIPTS. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order on the Clerk of the Court for the Fremont County District Court, by facsimile to (719) 269-0134 and by regular mail to Clerk of the Court, Fremont County District Court, 136 Justice Center Rd., Canon City, CO 81212. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 07/26/2010. (sah, )
March 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MINUTE ORDER granting 17 Letter Request to File Reply. Applicant may reply to the answer/ response to the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus on or before April 16, 2010, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/18/10.(bnbcd, )
September 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER to Dismiss in Part and to Draw Case to A District Judge and to a Magistrate Judge. Applicant's second claim for relief is dismissed as procedurally barred and his third claim for relief is dismissed for failure to state a federal constitutional claim. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 09/09/2009. (sah, )
June 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 20 days Respondents shall file a Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 20 days of the filing of the Pre-Answer Applicant may file a Reply by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 06/25/09. (jjh, )
June 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 1 ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiency. Applicant shall have 30 days to pay the filing fee or file a 1915 motion, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/18/09. (jak, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reeves v. Trani et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Shawn M. Reeves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Travis Trani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?