Holland et al v. Standley and Associates, LLC
Plaintiff: Jay Holland and Alyssa Danielson-Holland
Defendant: Standley and Associates, LLC
Case Number: 1:2009cv01474
Filed: June 24, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Douglas
Presiding Judge: Richard P. Matsch
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Watanabe
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 114 ORDER STAYING CASE granting 107 MOTION to Stay re 102 Order pending appeal, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/4/2012. (rpmcd)
October 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER denying 90 Defendant's Motion for Attorney Fees [pertaining to the Fed. R. Civ. P 37 sanctions only]. Each party shall pay its own attorney fees and costs for this motion. This Order is limited to the Rule 37 sanctions being requested by Defendant per the Procedural Order on Defendant's Motion for Attorney Fees (docket no. 98), dated September 19, 2011, by Senior Judge Matsch. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 10/11/11.(mjwcd)
July 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 85 Stipulation and ORDER Regarding Custody of Exhibits and Depositions, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/19/2011. (rpmcd)
May 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER Setting Jury Trial for 7/18/2011 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom A by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 5/11/2011. (rpmcd)
April 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER re : 78 , Setting Pretrial Conference for 5/10/2011 at 03:00 PM in Conference Room and Proposed Pretrial Order due by 4:00 p.m. 5/5/2011, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/1/2011. (rpmcd)
March 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER Granting Judgment of Dismissal of All Claims Excepting 15 U.S.C. § 1692(d)(2). Court adopts and includes by this reference the findings and conclusions of Magistrate Judge Watanabe in the 75 recommendation (Pursuant to 75 granting in part and denying in part 56 Motion for Summary Judgment) and denies the 77 plaintiffs' objections. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a) all of the plaintiffs' claims in the first amended complaint are dismissed with the exception of the claim for a violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1692(d)(2) for abusive language and the plaintiffs' request for relief as a matter of law is denied. The pretrial order entered by Magistrate Judge Watanabe on July 7, 2010, is no longer operative, a new pretrial conference will be set to prepare for trial on the remaining claim, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/24/2011. (rpmcd) Modified on 3/24/2011 to correct linkage (jjh, ).
May 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 54 MINUTE ORDER denying 42 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Outstanding Discovery Responses and for Sanctions, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 5/7/2010.(mjwcd)
February 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MINUTE ORDER 33 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Outstanding Discovery Responses and for Sanctions is moot and is therefore denied, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 2/22/10.(gmssl, )
January 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MINUTE ORDER granting 30 parties' Stipulated Motion to Amend September 30, 2009 Scheduling Order re: Depositions; Fact discovery cut-off is extended to 3/1/2010, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 1/5/2010.(mjwcd)
November 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 27 Minute ORDER granting 20 Motion to Amend Complaint. The tendered First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand (doc no, 20-3) is accepted for filing as of the date of this minute order by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 11/02/09.(jjh, )
September 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MINUTE ORDER AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES; granting 16 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Modify Scheduling Order Dated August 21, 2009.Fact Discovery Cuf-off is 1/31/2010; Expert Discovery Cut-off is 4/30/2010. Dispositive Motions due by 5/28/2010. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 6/24/2010. Final Pretrial Conference reset for 6/30/2010 08:30 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. Settlement Conference set for 10/13/2009 11:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 09/30/2009.(mjwcd )
July 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 8/21/2009 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 07/10/2009. (mjwcd )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holland et al v. Standley and Associates, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jay Holland
Represented By: Tammy Lee Hussin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alyssa Danielson-Holland
Represented By: Tammy Lee Hussin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Standley and Associates, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?