Vuolo v. Garfield County Sheriffs et al
Gerard M. Vuolo |
Garfield County Sheriffs, Lou Vallario, Glenwood Springs Police Department, Terry Wilson, La Rocha and Smokers Friendly |
1:2009cv01476 |
June 24, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Kathleen M. Tafoya |
Zita L. Weinshienk |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 ORDER. The Court accepts and adopts the Recommendation in its entirety. The Motion To Dismiss Of Defendant Jeff LaRoche 42 is granted. Defendant Officer LaRocha is dismissed with prejudice from this action. The Complaint and cause of action are dismissed, the parties to pay their own costs and attorneys fees. A separate Judgment shall issue pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a). By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 04/15/2010.(sah, ) |
Filing 58 ORDER. The Court, after careful consideration, agrees with the Magistrate Judges analysis and conclusion that Defendant Smoker Friendly should be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) for lack of service. The Court accepts and adopts the Recommendation 57 in its entirety. The claims against Defendant Smoker Friendly be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) for lack of service. By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 01/20/2010.(sah, ) |
Filing 57 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. It is RECOMMENDED that the claims 2 against Defendant Smoker Friendly be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. O. 4 (m) for lack of service. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 12/01/2009. (sah, ) |
Filing 55 ORDER. Plaintiffs objections 44 are overruled. The Recommendation 40 is accepted and adopted in its entirety. The Glenwood Springs Defendants Motion To Dismiss 8 is granted. Defendants Garfield County Sheriffs and Sheriff LouVallarios Motion To Dismiss 10 is granted. Defendants Glenwood Springs Police Department, Garfield County Sheriffs Department, Police Chief Terry Wilson, and Sheriff Lou Vallario are dismissed. By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 11/23/2009.(sah, ) |
Filing 41 MINUTE ORDER granting 31 Defendant Wilson's Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Qualified Immunity Determination. All discovery is stayed as to Defendants Glenwood Springs Police Department, Garfield County Sheriffs Department, Police Chief Terry Wilson and Sheriff Lou Vallario, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 10/2/09.(gms, ) |
Filing 40 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Defendants Glenwood Springs Police Department, Terry Wilson and 10 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendants Garfield County Sheriffs, Lou Vallario be GRANTED and that Defendants Glenwood Springs Police Department, Garfield County Sheriffs Department, Police Chief Terry Wilson and Sheriff Lou Vallario be DISMISSED in their entirety. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 10/1/09. (kmtcd) |
Filing 37 Minute ORDER granting 34 Unopposed MOTION to Vacate Scheduling Conference by Defendants La Rocha, Glenwood Springs Police Department, Terry Wilson. Scheduling Conference set for 09/21/2009 is VACATED by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/16/09.(kmtcd) |
Filing 6 ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 9/22/2009 10:15 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 6/29/09. (gmssl, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.