Big O Tires, LLC v. D&T Auto Sales & Services, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Big O Tires, LLC
Defendant: D&T Auto Sales & Services, Inc., William T. Meek and Mary E. Meek
Case Number: 1:2009cv01509
Filed: June 26, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Arapahoe
Presiding Judge: Marcia S. Krieger
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION AND SETTING CONTEMPT HEARING: The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 38 is ADOPTED. Defendants D&T Auto Sales & Service Inc. and William T. Meek are ordered to SHOW CAUSE why they should not be held in cont empt at a CONTEMPT HEARING on 5/13/2010 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom A 901 before Judge Marcia S. Krieger. Failure to appear andshow cause why they should not be held in contempt can result in imposition offines and penalties, including arrest an d incarceration. The Plaintiff shall serve this Order on D&T Auto Sales & Service Inc., and William T. Meek no later than 14 days before the scheduled hearing, failing which such hearing will be vacated. Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 4/19/10.(msksec, )
November 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 11/27/09. (mskcd)
October 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER ENTERING DEFAULT JUDGMENT. Entry of Default Judgment is appropriate and the 15 Motion is GRANTED. A default has previously entered and Plaintiff has made a prima facie showing of entitlement to relief. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Big O Tires, Inc. and against Defendants in the following amounts: See Order for details. Default judgment against D&T and the Guarantors, jointly and severally, for a total of $112,640.77; Default judgment against T&M and the Guaran tors, jointly and severally, for a total of $84,527.87; Attorneys fees and costs against the Defendants, jointly and severally, for a total of $5,228.97. Interest against Defendants shall accrue at the contract rate of 18% per annum from the date of this Order until such judgment is satisfied. See Order for details. The Clerk is directed to close this case, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 10/05/2009.(wjc, )
June 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER SETTING LAW AND MOTION HEARING WITH REGARD TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION: The Court will conduct a non-evidentiary hearing on the 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Big O Tires, LLC on 7/29/2009 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom A 901 before Judge Marcia S. Krieger. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 6/29/09. (msksec, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Big O Tires, LLC v. D&T Auto Sales & Services, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Big O Tires, LLC
Represented By: Harold R. Bruno, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D&T Auto Sales & Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William T. Meek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mary E. Meek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?