Arrow Electronics, Inc. v. AC Technology, Inc. et al
| Arrow Electronics, Inc. |
| AC Technology, Inc., Earle D. Munns, Jr. and Michael Andrew Byrd |
| 1:2009cv01577 |
| July 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Walker D. Miller |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER granting 35 , and 37 Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 5/11/2010. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Settlement Conference set for 4/23/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 12/11/09. (kmtcd)
|
|
Filing
12
SECOND ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND RULE 26(f) PLANNING MEETING: Scheduling Conference set for 12/8/2009 09:45 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/23/09. (kmtcd)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND RULE 26(f) PLANNING MEETING: Scheduling Conference set for 10/1/2009 09:00 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 7/15/09. (kmtcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
