Health Grades, Inc. v. American Registry, LLC
Plaintiff: Health Grades, Inc.
Defendant: American Registry, LLC
Case Number: 1:2009cv01645
Filed: July 10, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Richard P. Matsch
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER of Dismissal With Prejudice. The Order of Preliminary and Permanent Injunction entered on March 12, 2010, shall remain in full force and effect and is subject to enforcement as set forth therein and under the applicable rules by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 03/16/10. (jjh, )
March 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER ORDER OF PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION re; 31 , signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/12/2010 (see Order for details).(rpmcd)
February 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER Granting 23 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand and the attached thereto is accepted for filing, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/2/2010.(rpmcd) Modified on 2/3/2010 to add a space between words (jjh, ).
January 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER On Motions to Amend Pleadings Re: 20 Motion to Amend and 21 Motion for Extension of Time. The date for filing amended pleadings in the 19 scheduling order is extended to permit the plaintiff to file its motion to amend the complaint to an d including February 1, 2010, and the defendant's motion to amend answer and affirmative defenses is granted but the tendered pleading is not filed because if the complaint is amended an additional answer will be required which will include what the defendant proposes to include in the answer to the existing complaint. If the plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint is opposed, the times for pleadings will be adjusted, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/26/2010.(rpmcd)
December 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER of REFERENCE for Settlement Conference, pursuant to re: 16 Joint MOTION Requesting Settlement Conference. This civil action is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer for the purpose of convening a settlement conference, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 12/21/2009. (rpmcd)
October 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 12/11/2009 at 11:00 AM in Conference Room and proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00p.m. on December 3, 2009, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/16/2009. (rpmcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Health Grades, Inc. v. American Registry, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Health Grades, Inc.
Represented By: Kris John Kostolansky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Registry, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?