Kajunju v. Immagine! Innovative Resources for Cognitive and Physical Challenges et al
Anasa Kajunju |
Immagine! Innovative Resources for Cognitive and Physical Challenges, John Taylor, Marianne Nick, Ricardo Hoskins, Nicole Truite, Department of Human Services, Susan Latchford, Amy Haight and Colorado Department of Health Care Policy & Financing |
1:2009cv01816 |
July 31, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Boulder |
David M. Ebel |
Michael J. Watanabe |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 ORDER. Plaintiffs Objection to Magistrate Watanabes Report & Recommendation is DENIED. Magistrate Watanabes Report & Recommendation is ADOPTED. This action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. All remaining motions pending in the action are DENIED as moot. By Judge David M. Ebel on 01/15/2010.(sah, ) |
Filing 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that this 1 action be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f) and/or 41(b) based upon the plaintiffs failure to appear, failure to prosecute, and failure to comply with court orders, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 10/27/2009. (wjc, ) |
Filing 20 ORDER Discharging the 5 Order to Show Cause dated 10/7/09, by Judge David M. Ebel on 10/23/09. (gmssl, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 10/13/2009 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 08/14/2009. (mjwcd ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.