Laratta v. Department of Corrections et al
Plaintiff: Giovanni Laratta
Defendant: Department of Corrections, George W. Dunbar and Mick McCormac
Case Number: 1:2009cv01832
Filed: August 3, 2009
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Fremont
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 76 filed 2/7/2011, is APPROVED and ADOPTED. The defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 68 filed 9/14/2010, is GRANTED. The due process claims asserted by the plaintiff in his Third Amen ded Prisoner Complaint 65 filed 8/24/2010, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. JUDGMENT SHALL ENTER in favor of the defendant, Mick McCormac, against the plaintiff, Giovanni Laratta. The defendant is AWARDED his costs. This case is CLOSED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/21/2011.(sah, )
September 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 70 MINUTE ORDER. In light of Judge Blackburns August 24, 2010 order, Plaintiffs Motion to Permit Discovery 66 is denied. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 09/20/2010.(sah, )
August 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER. The magistrate judges Recommendation on Motion To Reconsider 28 filed 01/25/2010, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. The plaintiffs objections 37 to the magistrate judges 01/25/2010, recommendation are OVERRULED AND DENIED. The plaintiffs Motion T o Reconsider Decision on Dismissal of Claim 10 filed 11/23/2009, is DENIED. The magistrate judges Recommendation on Motion To Dismiss and Motion for Preliminary Injunction 59 filed 04/15/2010, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. The plaintiffs Memorandum of Law in Support of Order To Show Cause for a Preliminary Injunction 18 filed 12/23/2009, which I read as amotion for preliminary injunction, is DENIED. The Defendants Motion To Dismiss 20 filed 01/08/2010, is GRANTED. The plaintiffs Motion for L eave To File an Amended Complaint 60 filed 07/16/2010, is GRANTED. The plaintiffs proposed Third Amended Prisoner Complaint [60-1] is ACCEPTED for filing. The defendants Motion To Continue Trial 45 filed 02/19/2010, is denied without prejudice. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 08/24/2010.(sah, )
April 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 58 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 47 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/12/2010. (mehcd)
March 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER granting 39 Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery. The Final Pretrial Conference scheduled for 8/19/2010 is vacated. The parties are directed to submit a status report within five days of the entry of any order adjudicating the pending Motion to Dismiss. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 3/9/2010. (mehcd)
February 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 42 TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/16/10. Trial Preparation Conference set for 10/8/2010 at 8:30 AM; three-day Jury Trial set for 10/25/2010 commencing at 8:30 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. (rebcd)
January 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MINUTE ORDER denying 25 Motion for More Definite Statement, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/25/2010. (mehcd)
November 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Requiring Service By United States Marshal. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 11/05/2009. (sah, )
November 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER to Dismiss in Part and to Draw Case to A District Judge and to a magistrate judge. Mr. Laratta's claims against Defendant George W. Dunbar are dismissed and Defendant Dunbar is dismissed as a party to this action. Mr. Laratta's Eigth Amendment claim against Defendant Mick McCormac is dismissed. The only remaining claim is Mr. Laratta's due process claim against Defendant McCormac. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 11/04/2009. (sah, )
August 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint within 30 days by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 08/18/09. (jjh, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Laratta v. Department of Corrections et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Giovanni Laratta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: George W. Dunbar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mick McCormac
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?