Klein/Frank, P.C. v. Krouner
Plaintiff: Klein/Frank, P.C.
Defendant: Todd Krouner
Case Number: 1:2009cv01909
Filed: August 11, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Boulder
Presiding Judge: Kathleen M. Tafoya
Presiding Judge: Kristen L. Mix
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. This civil action hereby is dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay his or its own costs and attorneys fees, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 02/19/2010. (wjc, )
December 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 53 MINUTE ORDER: Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a supplemental brief in response to Defendants Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction 25 , limited to the portion of the motion dealing with the Colorado River Doctrine and subject matter jurisdiction, no later than January 8, 2010. Defendant shall file a supplemental reply no later than January 15, 2010. Plaintiff's 47 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 11 until after the Court Rules on Plaintiffs Pending Motion to Compel Arbitration is DENIED. Plaintiff shall file its response to the Motion for Sanctions 38 no later than January 8, 2010. Defendant shall file his reply no later than January 15, 2010. Plainti ff's 34 Motion for Stay of All Proceedings until the Motion to Enforce Arbitration Agreement Has Been Decided is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff's 46 Motion to Set Trial to Determine Existence of Arbitration Agreement is DENIED without prejudice as premature. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 12/30/09. (kmtlc1 )
September 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND RULE 26(f) PLANNING MEETING: Scheduling Conference set for 11/10/2009 10:00 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/29/09. (kmtcd) Modified on 9/30/2009 to edit text date of hearing (wjc, ).
September 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 9/3/09. (mskcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Klein/Frank, P.C. v. Krouner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Klein/Frank, P.C.
Represented By: Carrie R. Frank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Todd Krouner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?