Trimble v. Trani et al
| Miguel Trimble |
| Travis Trani and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The |
| 1:2009cv01943 |
| August 14, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Lincoln |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
MINUTE ORDER denying 55 Motion for Certificate of Appealability as the issue of a certificate of appealability was addressed in this court's Order Denying 28 U.S.C.§2254 Application entered August 5, 2011 by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 09/07/11.(bjrsl, )
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER to Cure Deficiency re 54 Notice of Appeal by Miguel Trimble, appellant has 30 days to either pay the filing fee or file a 1915 motion with district court by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 09/06/11. (bjrsl, )
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER Denying 28 U.S.C. 2254 Application 1 . The 45 motion to stay is denied. The action is dismissed with prejudice. No certificate of appealability will issue. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney fees, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 8/5/11.(lsw, )
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER to Forward All Records and Transcripts. The Clerk of the Court for the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Colorado, as the lawful custodian of the records, shall forward the flat file and hearing transcripts for all proceedings i n the trial court and in the appellate court in People v. Miguel Trimble, Denver County District Court, Case No. 99CR4106, to the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, 901 Nineteenth Street, Room 105, Denver Colorado, 80294-3589, on or before 11/15/2010. by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/15/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
38
MINUTE ORDER granting 37 Motion For Permission To File Traverse To Respondents Answer To Order To Show Cause. The Applicants Traverse To Respondents Answer To Show Cause [37-1] is accepted for filing. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 07/21/2010.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER Dismissing Case in Part and Drawing Case in Part to District Judge and to Magistrate Judge. The Application shall, in part, be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge, to include Claims One through Three, Subclaims 1 through 7, 9 th rough 19, and 21 in Claim Four, and Claims Five and Six. Subclaims 8 and 20 of Claim Four are dismissed as procedurally barred from federal habeas review. Subclaim 22 of Claim Four is dismissed as repetitive. By Judge Philip A Brimmer for Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 03/08/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER for Applicant to File Supplemental Reply within 21 days. Ordered that Applicant's request for an evidentiary hearing is denied. Ordered that within 21 days Applicant shall file a Supplemental Reply and assert a basis for any procedureal default by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/16/09. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER for Respondents to File Supplement to Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 20 days Respodents shall file a Supplement to the Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 20 days of the filing of the Supplement Applicant may file a Supplemental Reply by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/23/09. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 20 days Respondents shall file a Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 20 days of the filing of the Pre-Answer Response Applicant may file a Reply by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 08/19/09. (jjh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
