GEA Power Cooling Systems, LLC v. Bechtel Power Corporation
| GEA Power Cooling Systems, LLC |
| Bechtel Power Corporation |
| 1:2009cv02051 |
| August 27, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Jefferson |
| Richard P. Matsch |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER for Dismissal With Prejudice. Each party to be responsible for their own respective costs by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 06/29/10. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER for Filing Second Amended Complaint and Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Third Claim for Relief. 33 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint is granted and the Second Amended Complaint is filed. Defendant's motion to dismiss the third claim for relief, addressing the First Amended Complaint, is deemed filed as to the Second Amended Complaint and is denied. The second claim for relief in the Second Amended Complaint is stricken. Signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/18/2010.(rpmcd) Modified on 3/19/2010 to delete a duplicate word and to add 2 words missing from the text (gmssl, ).
|
|
Filing
26
Minute Entry - Courtroom Minutes for Scheduling Conference held on 1/5/2010 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: GEA's Partial Motion to Dismiss, filed November 25, 2009 20 , is denied. Bechtel's Motion to Dismiss the Second and Thir d Claims for Relief in GEA's First Amended Complaint, filed December 3, 2009 23 , is denied. Status Conference scheduled August 12, 2010. Status report due August 5, 2010. Plaintiff's claim for declaratory judgment is withdrawn. Responsive pleadings are due by January 15, 2010. Scheduling Order approved. (Reporter FTR - K. Terasaki) (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER Granting 17 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint and the First Amended Complaint attached thereto is accepted for filing, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/17/2009.(rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 1/5/2010 at 02:00 PM in Conference Room and proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on December 31, 2009, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/3/2009. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
8
Amended ORDER re: 7 Order Granting Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defenant Bechtel Power Corporation answer due 11/2/2009. Signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 9/29/2009. (rpmcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GEA Power Cooling Systems, LLC v. Bechtel Power Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: GEA Power Cooling Systems, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Clay Bell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bechtel Power Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
