Maynard et al v. Colorado Supreme Court Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel, The et al
| Alison Maynard and Gerald Lewis |
| Colorado Supreme Court Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel, The, April McMurrey, John Gleason, James Coyle, Colorado Supreme Court, Mary Mullarkey, Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr., Nancy Rice, Michael Bender, Nathan Ben Coats, Alex Martinez and Allison Eid |
| 1:2009cv02052 |
| August 27, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Wiley Y. Daniel |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
261
ORDER Adopting Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 242 , is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as an Order of the Court. This case is DISMISSED, with prejudice, by Judge John L. Kane on 7/25/12.(sgrim)
|
|
Filing
259
USCA ORDER re: 246 Letter re writ of mandamus. The matter is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 42.1. and 3.3(B). USCA case no. 11-1363. (bjrsl, )
|
|
Filing
235
ORDER to Cure Deficiency re 228 Notice of Appeal by Alison Maynard and Gerald Lewis, appellants have 30 days to file their 1915 motion using the Court's form by Judge John L. Kane on 05/10/11. (bjrsl, )
|
|
Filing
223
MINUTE ORDER denying 221 Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Recusal, by Judge John L. Kane on 5/2/11.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
218
ORDER denying 215 Motion to Recuse, by Judge John L. Kane on 4/21/11.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
211
ORDER Granting Motion to Consolidate, Striking Civil Action and Notice re: Rule 11 Sanctions. Granting 210 Plaintiff' Motion to Consolidate with New Case 11-cv-901 [and] for Joint Hearing on Application for Preliminary Injunction. Current re ferral of 11-cv-901 to the pro se docket is withdrawn. The complaint in 11-cv-901 is stricken. Ms. Maynard is notified her filing of 11-cv-901 subjects her to sanctions. Hearing on Rule 11 issues and appropriate sanctions are deferred. 11-cv-901 is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, by Judge John L. Kane on 4/7/11.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
202
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASE WITH RELATED CASE 09-cv-02052 AND WITHDRAWING REFERENCE. 09-cv-02052 and 10-cv-01850 are consolidated. All future filings shall be made in the lead case 09-cv-02052. Action to be captioned as set forth in the order. The ope rative complaints ( 1 Complaint) are stricken without prejudice to being refiled at some point. Status Report due by 4/15/2011. All currently pending motions are denied as moot ( 64 Motion to Dismiss; 123 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify; 137 R eport and Recommendation; 150 APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court; 151 APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court; 152 Motion to Strike; 161 Report and Recommendation; 181 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; 182 Motion for Leave; 184 Motion to Supplement; 185 Motion to Consolidate Cases; 186 Motion to Strike),by Judge John L. Kane on 3/29/11.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
200
AMENDED TRANSFER ORDER. Matter is transferred to Senior Judge Kane, re: 199 Order, by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 3/24/11. (gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
198
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), I RECUSE myself from this case. The case SHALL BE REASSIGNED pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1B. and F. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/22/2011. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
194
ORDER OF RECUSAL. The Court having determined that 09-cv-02052 and 10-cv-01850 are related matters and orders of recusal having entered in both cases, 09-cv-02052 is to be randomly drawn and 10-cv-01850 is to be directly assigned to the same judge randomly drawn for 09-cv-02052. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 3/16/2011. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
180
ORDER. Joint Status Report due by 2/23/2011, by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/14/11. (mnf, )
|
|
Filing
148
ORDER OF RECUSAL directing reassignment to another judge. By Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 08/12/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
146
ORDER OF RECUSAL directing reassignment to another magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 08/09/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
138
ORDER Overruling 124 Plaintiff Maynard's APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE's Order of 4/28/10; denying as moot 130 Plaintiff Maynard's Motion to Stay or Extension to Reply, by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 7/29/10.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
136
ORDER denying 115 Proposed Intervenor Halena Lewiss Amended Motion to Intervene, Waiver of FRCP Rule 24(c), and Motion for Sixty (60) Day Extension. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 7/14/2010.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
109
Minute ORDER denying without prejudice 104 Motion to Intervene, Waiver of FRCP [sic] Rule 24(c), and Motion for Sixty (60) Day Extension by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/1/2010.(kmtcd, )
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER denying 91 MOTION for Order to Disclose from the Magistrate, and MOTION for Recusal by Plaintiff by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 1/20/2010.(kmtcd, )
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER granting 69 MOTION to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by Defendants. Discovery is STAYED pending ruling on dfts' motion to dismiss 64 . DENYING 83 MOTION for Order to do Discovery, Including Ren ewed Motin for Rule 56(f) Extension, Partial Responses to Motion to Stay Discovery and Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiffs. Parties shall file a status report within 10 days of ruling on the pending motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 1/13/2010.(kmtcd, )
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER OVERRULED 66 Plaintiff Alison Maynards APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court; denying 67 Plaintiff Alison Maynards Emergency Motion for Ruling; denying 73 Plaintiff Alison Maynards Motion for Default Judgment; OVERRULING 78 Plaintiff Alison Maynards APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 12/10/09.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER denying 25 Plaintiffs Verified Forthwith Motion for Reconsideration Denial of Preliminary Injunction by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 11/5/09.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
56
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 31 Motion for Extension of Time ; denying as moot 36 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; denying as moot 37 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; denying without prejudice 24 Motion to Dismiss. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 11/3/09.(kmtlc1)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Shaffer recused. Clerk to assign another magistrate judge by random draw. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 10/28/2009. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER OF RECUSAL directing reassignment to another judge. By Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 10/15/2009. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER OF RECUSAL directing reassignment to another judge. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 10/09/2009. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER denying 16 Plaintiff Alison Maynard's Motion for Mandatory TRO, and denying 18 Modification of TRO Application, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/17/09.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
17
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Philip A. Brimmer. Motion Hearing held on 9/8/2009. Denying 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Denying as Moot 14 Motion for TRO. (Court Reporter Janet Coppock) (pabcd)
|
|
Filing
7
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Philip A. Brimmer. Motion Hearing held on 8/28/2009. Denying 2 Motion for TRO. Motion Hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction set for 9/8/2009 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 701 before Judge Philip A. Brimmer. Witness and Exhibit lists are due by 12:00 noon on September 4, 2009. (Court Reporter Janet Coppock) (pabcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
