Stone et al v. Vail Resorts Development Company et al
| Nelson Stone and Stone Family LLC |
| Vail Resorts Development Company and Arrabelle at Vail Square, LLC |
| 1:2009cv02081 |
| August 31, 2009 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| John L. Kane |
| Kristen L. Mix |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
ORDER. ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Reopen (ECF No. 63) is DENIED. ORDERED that the terms of my Order Compelling Arbitration 30 , SHALL REMAIN in full force and effect. ORDERED that pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2, this case shall remain administratively closed. If no action is taken to reopen this case before November 1, 2013, the case will be dismissed without prejudice without any further notice to either party by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 12/20/12.(jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER granting 16 Motion to Compel Arbitration. It is FURTHER ORDERED that since the length of the arbitration process is uncertain, I find that this case should be administratively closed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2 with leave to be reopened f or good cause shown. If no action is taken to reopen this case before May 1, 2011, the case will be dismissed without prejudice without any further notice to either party. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this case is STAYED as to Defendant VRDC pending the completion of the arbitration. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 7/1/2010.(ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER granting 17 Defendants Motion to Stay Pending Determination of Motion to Compel Arbitration and Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's First Ser of Written Discovery to Defendants; Denying as moot 20 Defendants Motion f or Extension of Time from the date on which the Court rules on their Motion to Stay. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon the resolution of the Defendants Motion to Compel Arbitration, the parties are directed to file a Joint Status Report, indicating whether a second Scheduling Conference should be set in this matter and proposing dates for any necessary conference. by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/7/2010.(erv, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
