Dambman et al v. Long
| Mary Dambman, Kevin Kreeger and Edward Snyder |
| Karen Long |
| 1:2009cv02167 |
| September 10, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Adams |
| Philip A. Brimmer |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to the 13 Stipulated Notice of Dismissal With Prejudice. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), this matter, and all claims asserted therein, is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 11/13/09. (ebs, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER granting 2 Plaintiff's MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order which the Court converted into a motion for preliminary injunction with the consent of the parties. Defendant Karen Long is hereby enjoined from including the term "District Attorney" in the ballot language identified in Exhibit 1 to the 9/15/09 injunction hearing for the November 2009 election in Adams County. No bond shall post under Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(c), by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/16/09. (ebs, )
|
|
Filing
10
Minute Entry for Motion Hearing held on 9/15/2009 before Judge Philip A. Brimmer. 2 Motion for TRO converted to Motion for Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED. (Court Reporter Janet Coppock) (pabcd)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER OF RECUSAL directing reassignment to another judge by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 09/11/2009. (sah, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
