Roos et al v. Martinez et al
| Margaret Denormandie Roos |
| Washington Mutual Bank |
| Lynn Martinez |
| United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado and U.S. Trustee |
| 1:2009cv02179 |
| September 14, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| John L. Kane |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER granting 33 Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal. Appeal is dismissed, the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs, by Judge John L. Kane on 6/17/10.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
30
MINUTE ORDER. Appellants Eleventh Unopposed Motion to Modify Briefing Schedule 29 , filed 04/16/2010, is GRANTED. Appellant Brief due by 5/17/2010. Appellee Brief due by 6/7/2010. Appellant Reply Brief due by 6/21/2010, by Judge John L. Kane on 04/16/2010.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
28
MINUTE ORDER. Appellants Tenth Unopposed Motion to Modify Briefing Schedule 27 filed 04/02/2010, is GRANTED. Appellant Brief due by 4/16/2010. Appellee Brief due by 5/7/2010. Appellant Reply Brief due by 5/21/2010, by Judge John L. Kane on 04/05/2010.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
26
MINUTE ORDER granting 25 Appellant's Ninth Unopposed Motion to Modify Briefing Schedule. Appellant Brief due by 4/2/2010. Appellee Brief due by 4/23/2010. Appellant Reply Brief due by 5/7/2010, by Judge John L. Kane on 3/29/10.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
24
MINUTE ORDER granting 23 Appellant's Eighth Unopposed Motion to Modify Briefing Schedule. Appellant Brief due by 3/26/2010. Appellee Brief due by 4/16/2010. Appellant Reply Brief due by 4/30/2010, by Judge John L. Kane on 3/22/10.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
22
MINUTE ORDER granting 21 Appellant's Seventh Unopposed Motion to Modify Briefing Schedule. Appellant Brief due by 3/19/2010. Appellee Brief due by 4/9/2010. Appellant Reply Brief due by 4/23/2010, by Judge John L. Kane on 3/12/10.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
20
MINUTE ORDER granting 19 Appellant's Sixth Unopposed Motion to Modify Briefing Schedule. Appellant Brief due by 3/12/2010. Appellee Brief due by 4/5/2010. Appellant Reply Brief due by 4/19/2010, by Judge John L. Kane on 3/8/10.(gms, )
|
|
Filing
18
MINUTE ORDER granting 17 Appellant's Fifth Unopposed Motion to Modify Briefing Schedule. Appellant Brief due by 3/5/2010. Appellee Brief due by 3/26/2010. Appellant Reply Brief due by 4/9/2010, by Judge John L. Kane on 2/18/10.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
16
MINUTE ORDER granting 15 Appellant's Fourth Unopposed Motion to Modify Briefing Schedule. Appellant Brief due by 2/19/2010. Appellee Brief due by 3/12/2010. Appellant Reply Brief due by 3/26/2010, by Judge John L. Kane on 2/5/10.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER granting 13 Third Unopposed Motion to Modify Briefing Schedule. Appellant Brief due by 2/5/2010. Appellee Brief due by 2/26/2010. Appellant Reply Brief due by 3/12/2010, by Judge John L. Kane on 1/4/10.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
12
MINUTE ORDER granting 11 Appellant's Second Unopposed Motion to Modify Briefing Schedule. Appellant Brief due by 1/5/2010. Appellee Brief due by 1/26/2010. Appellant Reply Brief due by 2/9/2010, by Judge John L. Kane on 12/4/09.(gms, )
|
|
Filing
10
MINUTE ORDER granting Appellant's 9 Unopposed Motion to Modify Briefing Schedule. Appellant's Opening Brief is due by 12/4/2009. Appellee's Response Brief is due by 12/21/2009. Appellant's Reply Brief is due by 1/4/2010, by Judge John L. Kane on 11/5/09.(lam, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
